To: iopscusa; Owl558
1 missile to Seoul and South Korea is done. A withdrawl of the US umbrella means nuclear proliferation as the south responds with the only proven way to counter nuclear weapons - MAD. Ditto across Asia. Does this enhance US security or hurt it?
...
... disagree with calling PBs get the troops out of SK and Germany as supporting the NWO. I think the NWO has been using/busing the US Military since WW 1, if not before.
Well, right now we have a future of NWO in the background influencing all the important governments, the Chinese urbanization bubble creating a huge appetite for grabbing up smaller productive nations, as well as raw materials. This drives up global commodity prices creating a stronger headwind for Chinese economic prosperity the bigger the bubble gets. IMHO, pulling US troops out SK makes US backing for SK much less certain. Though SK might be able to take on NK by itself, if China were to come to the aid of NK and the US did not aid SK, SK would be gobbled up.
Of course, it is sensible to object to NWO influences of wars, revolutions and enslaving people to government debt. Up this point, of course, NWO has not precipitated direct war between the three superpowers, however we can't assume that this will always be NWO's plan. However, with or without NWO (though it looks like NWO is well-implanted), signing over SK to China would just build the Chinese bubble higher, IMHO.
53 posted on
02/15/2013 3:55:04 PM PST by
PieterCasparzen
(We have to fix things ourselves)
To: PieterCasparzen
I’m thinking NWO=UN, WB, IMF, BIS, EU, GB, USSA, Israel + smaller allied countries + Saudi Arabia & all dollar based oil producing countries. NATO has become the enforcement and acquisition arm of the NWO. Feel free to disabuse if you think this is not correct.
60 posted on
02/17/2013 8:24:31 AM PST by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson