Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2013 6:18:08 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

PattyO is a special kind of stupid isn’t he. It isn’t about being ‘friends’, it is about the much greater implication on us if a regional war breaks out there. It is cheaper and easier on us to remain that firewall.


2 posted on 02/15/2013 6:22:27 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The incompetence and mystifying policies of the Clinton administration and the bizarre meddling of Jimmy Carter in 1994 has resulted in a nuclear North Korea. It really is time to leave and let wealthy South Korea and China, who strong vested interests deal with it.


3 posted on 02/15/2013 6:24:40 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Just how many ENEMIES does Pat want us to have?

We already fed him Egypt, Libya, Iraq, and other nations in that area. Does he want a UNIFIED Korea staring us down? How about Japan, would he prefer them aligned with China (and yes, Japan pays the bill for our troops, SK might, not sure)? How about our hemisphere?

What’s his end-game here? Total isolation of the US, I guess...and then, without friends, we are crushed like an ant. Nice vision, Pat.


4 posted on 02/15/2013 6:26:43 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Pat, your new world order is showing.


6 posted on 02/15/2013 6:32:36 AM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yet again, we are seeing the repercussion of not taking the advice of our founders to heart—staying out of foreign entanglements. Though the circumstances of our current status of alliances can be well understood. The catastrophic results of the treaty of Versailles after WWI, was a good indication that someone had to manage events of post WWII. And that someone was the U.S., as we were the only remaining nation that was not devastated by that war. The total makeup of the world would be starkly different today had not the U.S. stood against the onslaught of Communism.
As for the U.S. still being in S. Korea, some old grizzled vets that I knew, firmly believed that the goal is not to keep the north from invading the south but the south from invading the north.
The unfortunate part about our current position in the world, is that it will be virtually impossible to backtrack and leave many of those nations to the fickle vagaries, of populations no longer interested in defending themselves. Its the consequences that our national parks have long understood when visitors are told to not feed the bears.


8 posted on 02/15/2013 6:39:28 AM PST by Tony703
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bring those troops home and fortify our own DMZ to the south. Let Korea spend their own money.


11 posted on 02/15/2013 6:44:27 AM PST by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

All Korea has to do is give their nuke to Iran who has permission to fire it from Venezuela.

And I think it’s March 15th that our southern air defense becomes non-existent. Anybody who wants can launch something into the airspace on our southern border and we won’t even necessarily know until it goes off. Not that we’d actually try to intercept something if it was headed there anyway - the lame-duck democrats were still able to get our soon-to-be-Republican House to agree to give up on developing our missile defense system in December of 2010...

When are people going to realize just how dangerous this foreign enemy combatant occupying our White House really is? Our enemies have all the capability they need, to bring this country down in a big, big way.


16 posted on 02/15/2013 7:10:19 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Buchanan seems impervious to the point that, in assuring international order and suppressing or balancing against regional military threats, the US benefits immensely from the resulting preferential access to essential resources, markets, and capital. In effect, as the biggest, strongest kid whom everyone wants to have on their team, we demand to and are treated especially well.

Buchanan is correct though about one thing: North Korea's progress in developing and proliferating nuclear weapons and ballistic missile technology logically suggests that Japan and Taiwan should develop an inventory of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles to deter China. The Obama administration bobbled the ball because they should have been repeatedly telling that to China and demanding that they block North Korea and replace the Kim regime. Now, the US must deliver that same message to China with all the persuasive force that can be brought to bear.

17 posted on 02/15/2013 7:12:05 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Frigging idiot isolationist Buccanan.


18 posted on 02/15/2013 7:21:00 AM PST by Andrei Bulba (No Obama, no way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Any country with South Korea's industrial base can afford to defend themselves.

Bring our troops home.

21 posted on 02/15/2013 7:28:24 AM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Cause we said we would....

Nuff said


22 posted on 02/15/2013 7:31:28 AM PST by petro45acp (No good endeavour survives an excess of adult supervision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I beleive korea is still a UN mission.
Why is the US carrying the load ?

If we remove 28k troops, does S.korea economy go down the tubes ?
Do we care ?


24 posted on 02/15/2013 7:34:18 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Because that’s what the Elders of Zion want? /sarcasm


34 posted on 02/15/2013 8:19:38 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Experts believe North Korea is still far from having the capability to marry a nuclear warhead to a missile that could hit the West Coast. But this seems to be Kim's goal.

They have no SHIPS?

47 posted on 02/15/2013 9:48:10 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Why Are We Still on the DMZ?

UHhh...

To be close to CHINA?

48 posted on 02/15/2013 9:48:57 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I sleep better at night knowing Kim will never be able to hit the East Coast with an ICBM...


49 posted on 02/15/2013 10:45:25 AM PST by FDNYRHEROES (It's 3 AM. Let me sleep on it. I'll get back to you in 16 hours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson