To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All
What say you about a filibuster of John Brennan, if Brennan refuses to answer that and perhaps other questions?
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I didn’t care too much for his old man but I’m starting to like this guy more and more. He could be what this country needs in 2016. Guts and standing up to the left.
3 posted on
02/14/2013 8:06:37 AM PST by
Signalman
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Never mind "over use of drones,"
what about Brennan shipping weapons from Benghazi to Syria? It makes the White House directly complicit in Stevens' death (especially if he didn't know what was going on) and makes Zero's "non involvement" during the attack (itself a big deal) a relative non-issue compared to what was really going on, a mere exercise in the usual hypocrisy.
If Brennan was truly running that CIA operation, then Zero knew damned well what was going on and was willing to make Stevens expendable. Worse, if Stevens had found out what the CIA was doing and was going to blow the whistle, it makes the lack of security deliberate, and therefore an act of murder as part of the coverup. Motive, means, and opportunity. AQ would then be doing him a favor.
4 posted on
02/14/2013 8:14:09 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Rand Paul is going to make a lot of noise, then vote the way he is told.
The man should not be confirmed - ever.
Why is Paul fixated on the drones?
6 posted on
02/14/2013 8:21:33 AM PST by
svcw
(Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
7 posted on
02/14/2013 8:23:18 AM PST by
stuartcr
("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson