Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks cripplecreek.
It's no surprise Schauer lost to Tim Walberg in 2010, a year that was big for Republicans, but it is surprising that someone who worked so hard on economic development and once earned support from moderate Republicans for his results-above-rhetoric approach squandered that support once he went to Washington.
IOW, the party-line shill who wrote that swill is surprised that a candidate from the Demagogic Party stabbed supporters and voters in the back.


14 posted on 02/05/2013 5:43:10 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

The only reason Schauer even won the seat was because of the NRCC tossing Walberg overboard after he bucked the establishment and voted against the big bailout of 08. They stripped Walberg of funding in the final weeks of the campaign, called him a lost cause and Schauer won by a whopping 2%.

The tea party returned the lost cause to Washington in 2010.


15 posted on 02/05/2013 6:05:09 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson