Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swept Away - Navy to scrap $277 million ship to avoid scraping reef
The Washington Free Beacon ^ | 1/30/2013 | Adam Kredo

Posted on 01/30/2013 12:35:06 PM PST by PieterCasparzen

A United States minesweeper ship that crashed into a coral reef due to inaccurate Navy maps will have to be cut into small pieces and removed in order to prevent harming the ocean’s ecosystem, according to the Navy and other reports.

The $277 million USS Guardian, a Naval warship that clears waterways of mines, crashed into a coral reef near the Philippines earlier this month.

The Navy will disassemble it piece by piece in order to avoid damaging the reef rather than tow the multi-million dollar ship off of the reef and perform necessary repairs.

“Our only supportable option is to dismantle the damaged ship and remove it in sections,” Capt. Darryn James, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet, was quoted as saying Tuesday by the Military Times.

One Navy source criticized decision makers for deliberately destroying the expensive warship just weeks before devastating cuts to the defense budget are scheduled to take place.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: federalspending; military; navy; usnavy; ussgaurdian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Need to scream and yell about this, we're goin' nuts with this already. It's one reef, it'll bounce back. Nuts.
1 posted on 01/30/2013 12:35:12 PM PST by PieterCasparzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Are you F’n kidding me?

This is beyond nuts. We are the laughing stock of every competent military in the world!


2 posted on 01/30/2013 12:39:09 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Substantially more damage will be done to the reef in the process of dismantling the ship than if it were simply tugged off the reef. Politically correct policy run amuck, again.


3 posted on 01/30/2013 12:39:09 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we must tolerate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

The US Navy..

1. Put women on nuclear subs

2. Names new ships after 60’s radicals

3. Makes combat aviation documentaries featuring ONLY minorities

4. Cuts up $0.2 billion ships to avoid damaging REEFS


4 posted on 01/30/2013 12:40:51 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

The goal of course is to do as much massive destruction to the reef as is possible all in the name of protecting these tiny critters.


5 posted on 01/30/2013 12:41:52 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we must tolerate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

I went to the original article on ABC (not the linked posting). There may be more to it—it’s a wooden-hulled minesweeper, and the hull is trashed and leaking. They could have lifted it onto a barge, but they claim it’s too damaged for that.


6 posted on 01/30/2013 12:43:37 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Anchor the dang thing there and claim it in the name of Obama.


7 posted on 01/30/2013 12:45:33 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

This is monumentally asinine. The ship can easily be floated off the reef. What in fact is the nature of the reef? Is a more ignorant, ridiculous solution even conceivable?


8 posted on 01/30/2013 12:47:03 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we must tolerate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Yeah, read that too. Not your “typical” ship it seems.


9 posted on 01/30/2013 12:49:46 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

That’s true, it’s been sitting there getting the crap beat out of it 24/7. The hull is really beyond repair.


10 posted on 01/30/2013 12:50:59 PM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
And don't forget those new "aquaflage" uniforms ...

11 posted on 01/30/2013 12:54:19 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I see the mail (uk) has the same story.

For something that cost $277 million, though, I’d think fix the hull.

I have no idea not being knowledgable on the subject, but scrapping it entirely, I don’t see how they’d do that. Seems like it could get towed back and have a new hull for less than $277 million.

Who knows the way things are now. Every piece of military equipment we lose is money out the window is all I keep thinking. We’re borrowing billions per day.


12 posted on 01/30/2013 12:54:19 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

IT’S A WOODEN HULLED SHIP. Mine sweepers can’t have metal hulls..........


13 posted on 01/30/2013 12:55:06 PM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

They are for when you fall overboard, they cant find you. Saves a lot of time and money...........


14 posted on 01/30/2013 12:56:22 PM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
The ship can easily be floated off the reef.

No it can't; it went hard aground at high water, then heavy seas pushed it further aground.

The article is garbage, written by an idiot, designed to attract the attention of those who enjoy being outraged and also don't know what they are talking about.

The ship is being cut apart because it's so heavily damaged (and flooded) that's the only way to get it off the reef. It was "totaled" long ago.

The accusation that the ship could have been saved were it not for excessive concern about the reef is beyond stupid.

15 posted on 01/30/2013 12:59:05 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; PieterCasparzen

Wood and/or GRP is quite normal for Mine Sweepers.


16 posted on 01/30/2013 12:59:05 PM PST by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day. liberals and logic: Never confuse the two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
We've come a long way from Bikini Atoll, baby!
17 posted on 01/30/2013 12:59:19 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose07

This one is probably trashed to splinters on the bottom..........


18 posted on 01/30/2013 1:02:22 PM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Red Badger wrote:
They are for when you fall overboard, they cant find you. Saves a lot of time and money...........

Not to mention that if they catch on fire, they melt into your skin. I had flame retardant dungaree’s when I was in the Navy (1988-1992), what’s so bad about them? Cause they’re not camo? Who cares - If I were to fall overboard, I’d want to be seen by anyone willing to rescue me!


19 posted on 01/30/2013 1:03:19 PM PST by ro_dreaming (G.K. Chesterton, “Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It’s been found hard and lef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Yes. Sounds like the keel is broken. It’s scrap anyway. What a bummer for the crew. And we don’t have enough MSMs as it is.


20 posted on 01/30/2013 1:04:23 PM PST by pabianice (washington, dc ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson