Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Obama violate the Constitution to protect it?
msnbc ^ | january 14, 2013 | Faiven Feshazion

Posted on 01/26/2013 9:12:19 AM PST by lowbridge

Our government is guided by the U.S. Constitution, the vital document created over 200 years ago that includes founding ideals which protect civil liberties of Americans. With the help of appointed and elected government officials, the United States runs on a set of unchangeable principles and carefully added amendments.

Recently, the debt ceiling debate called into question the Constitution and how the president’s power is demarcated in the original text. The issue lies in whether or not President Obama should bypass Congress and make the executive decision to raise the spending limit.

It is not unprecedented to violate the Constitution deliberately, with good intention. In 1861, Abraham Lincoln used this path when he suspended habeas corpus in an effort to save the country during the civil war. In doing so, President Lincoln was successful in reuniting the government. On Saturday, host Melissa Harris-Perry and her panel discussed when it would be necessary for the Commander-in-Chief to trump the age-old document.

“The president needs to get his best legal advice and move forward [without Congress]” said Seton Hall University law professor Mark Alexander on Saturday’s Melissa Harris-Perry, urging that valuable time is being wasted in Washington debating the debt ceiling issue.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; melissaharrisperry; msnbc; obama; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: lowbridge

Violate the Constitution deliberately, with good intention.

Only a progressive has logic like that,spin isn’t dead.


21 posted on 01/26/2013 9:30:46 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I’ve been waiting for the Supreme Court to declare the Constitution Unconstitutional.


22 posted on 01/26/2013 9:32:04 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

GoodLord. When Lincoln took those desperate measures, he at least had the excuse of a savage war that he had to win or else! Obama’s only excuse is to provide an executive honey pot he can use to buy votes.


23 posted on 01/26/2013 9:32:29 AM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kjo
What’s Obama’s emergency?

Wreckers.

24 posted on 01/26/2013 9:34:10 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
If the federal government doesn't feel compelled to follow the laws of the land, neither do I.

That's how I feel.
25 posted on 01/26/2013 9:34:57 AM PST by guardian_of_liberty (We must bind the Government with the Chains of the Constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

I really like that idea. Lets do it!


26 posted on 01/26/2013 9:38:30 AM PST by An Old Man (IMPEACH>>>IMPEACH>>>IMPEACH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

I really like that idea. Lets do it!


27 posted on 01/26/2013 9:38:39 AM PST by An Old Man (IMPEACH>>>IMPEACH>>>IMPEACH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The sad thing is that neither party is willing to stand up to him.


28 posted on 01/26/2013 9:42:36 AM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Let’s just defund and get rid of the the office of the president....to protect it.


29 posted on 01/26/2013 9:43:27 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I wonder how quickly these leftists would recoil in horror if the same question were asked when Bush was in office.


30 posted on 01/26/2013 9:43:55 AM PST by Washi (PUSH BACK! Encourage your legislators to introduce pro-second amendment legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I don’t think that added violation of our Constitution would be quite enough to trigger a shooting war - yet. It would, however, trigger widespread violations of federal law as it destroyed a significant part of our remaining respect for the rule of law.


31 posted on 01/26/2013 9:44:56 AM PST by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Abraham Lincoln used this path when he suspended habeas corpus in an effort to save the country during the civil war.Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

Habeus Corpus is a prviledge, not a right

32 posted on 01/26/2013 9:46:58 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
BEHOLD! The power of stupid.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
33 posted on 01/26/2013 9:51:38 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Wow, I’m speechless!


34 posted on 01/26/2013 10:02:40 AM PST by TsonicTsunami08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Oh, please tell me this is satire! Lol.......


35 posted on 01/26/2013 10:07:38 AM PST by PoplarBluffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TsonicTsunami08

LOL

Please withhold my name because I’m an idiot.


36 posted on 01/26/2013 10:10:48 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mort56

Lol


37 posted on 01/26/2013 10:25:02 AM PST by axxmann (If McCain is conservative then I'm a freakin' anarchist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

38 posted on 01/26/2013 10:40:00 AM PST by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Henhouse meet fox.


39 posted on 01/26/2013 10:49:04 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

If there is no Constitution, there are no laws in this lawless land. Is that something the fools at msnbc are ready to live with?


40 posted on 01/26/2013 10:59:30 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson