Posted on 01/25/2013 8:03:48 AM PST by green iguana
If SCOTUS holds that the issue is not judiciable, then the ruling below is quashed, and the appointments are restored.
I don’t believe that USSC will take it up even to that extent (to rule it “not judicible”) but I suspect we’re likely to find that out within a month or two.
Maybe I missed something. Did he lie under oath?
“Did Obama lie under oath”?
so you think lying under oath is the only impeachable offense?
here is one list of potential impeachable offenses.
http://redflagnews.com/opinion/obamas-impeachable-offenses-updated-by-michael-connelly-jd-carrollton-tx
I don’t agree or disagree with this list. I do think there should have been impeachment hearings to examine some of these items. (but the Senate would never convict? waah waah) so friggin’ what? Impeach the bastard anyway
“The ruling acknowledged that it conflicts in parts with what other federal appeals courts have held about recess appointments.”
That rather sets this opinion up for SCOTUS.
I didn’t even think of the judges and the cases they heard. That’s even a bigger mess.
Obamas Power Grabs Hannity
Sean Hannitys list of Obamas unconstitutional power grabs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNpwjcX6Vas
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.