Posted on 01/23/2013 10:40:10 AM PST by FR_addict
2pm (ET)
LIVE: Investigation of Benghazi Attack
She is just such a hag. That she would speak of the four people who were killed in a horrid and despicable way and not catch on fire for her lies boggles my mind. I just hope there is at least one House Member who has the guts to ask her WHO GAVE THE STAND DOWN ORDER. I sadly bet no one will.
She is just such a hag. That she would speak of the four people who were killed in a horrid and despicable way and not catch on fire for her lies boggles my mind. I just hope there is at least one House Member who has the guts to ask her WHO GAVE THE STAND DOWN ORDER. I sadly bet no one will.
This is disgusting, truly slobbering disgusting.
Oh, I understand that.
The Hearing is not about post event gonna do’s, it is about incompetence PRIOR to the event. Hillary wants to look forward, not examine her dereliction to the first duty of the state dept, answering the need for safety of diplomats.
Testimony from the first hearing dismissed money as the cause of rejecting protection support from the dead ambassador.
She was flying in the air constantly to avoid leading her department.
I think the House will ask better and more direct questions. Hillary is part of the club in the Senate. They protect their own regardless of party.
“Guaranteed, Hillary will re-direct, away from “systemic failures” PRIOR to the Benghazi attack, and LAUNCHING her wonderfulness AFTER the attack.
Just watch and see. Everything will be POST event. Nail her on this fact, somebody.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Exactly! Her entire testimony strategy depends on steering the committee in that direction, as it did this morning.
I’ll like not stay till the end. She’s not about to admit to any failings on her part.
She’s into the blame game.
the hag isn’t even looking at the Chairman as he asks her a question...b*tch
Not that it means anything to her, but was she sworn in.
I am starting to think more and more that I will see it (the shootin) in my lifetime. I”m 63.
Is she READING her answers??
I wish someone would remind her that she is leaving State and that based on her past failings, her opinions on a way forward will not be sought.
If she did a thorough investigation, she must certainly know which senior official turned down Stevens request for security.
Actually, it is about failures prior, during, and after the attack. Our people should never have been there in the first place if the host country was deemed inadequate to protect our personnel. During the attack, we failed to help our personnel in danger. And afterwards, we had the cover-up. So many questions, so little answers.
Someone, please, say, “Look witch, 4 AMERICANS WERE SLAUGHTERED ON YOUR WATCH, WHO GAVE THE STAND DOWN ORDER?”
Why aren’t Chaffetz, Gowdy, Adams etc getting a shot at PIAPS? They were the ones that grilled that Amb. Kennedy and the bag lady from State that he brought with him. Do we not have a Republican majority? Who the hell decides what Committee does the questioning? Is Boner involved in this? I am just so disgusted with how these lying POS continue to get away with it. Don’t even get me started about the media! Not enough bad things can happen to those people!!
This was an issue with Holder in Fast and Furious i believe. Its not a courtesy they would extend you or I.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.