Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: Investigation of Benghazi Attack (House Hearings - 2pm)
US House on C-Span3 ^ | 1/23/2013 | US House

Posted on 01/23/2013 10:40:10 AM PST by FR_addict

2pm (ET)

LIVE: Investigation of Benghazi Attack


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 113th; benghazihearings; caliphate; ciacrimes; coverup; cspan; gunrunning; hearings; hillarygraphic; hillaryhearing; hillaryhousehearing; house; illegalarms; islamists; lies; livehillaryhearing; morsi; randpaul; soros; soshillary; syria; turkey; whatdifference
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-557 next last
To: SE Mom

Guaranteed, Hillary will re-direct, away from “systemic failures” PRIOR to the Benghazi attack, and LAUNCHING her wonderfulness AFTER the attack.

Just watch and see. Everything will be POST event. Nail her on this fact, somebody.


41 posted on 01/23/2013 11:27:14 AM PST by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MomofMarine

So true.


42 posted on 01/23/2013 11:27:53 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Okay, she got her 3am phone call... was she prepared? Did she help solve the problem? Why are Americans dead and the only people prosecuted are 2 military command officers who tried to help in the vacuum left by Hilary and Obama?


43 posted on 01/23/2013 11:28:15 AM PST by Sweet Hour of Prayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
No doubt, Hillary would refuse to testify it were under oath.

The Board was far from being non-partisan. Pickering is a career diplomat and Mullen is also a career military officer. The other three members of the board were career government bureaucrats. There should have been an outside investigation.

44 posted on 01/23/2013 11:28:39 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: onyx; advertising guy; FR_addict; ken5050

Who is the young guy over Hillary’s left shoulder... the guy with the constant grin on his face? What does he thinks is so amusing?


45 posted on 01/23/2013 11:29:16 AM PST by nutmeg (FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Same old crap. She will slide. (Again)


46 posted on 01/23/2013 11:30:31 AM PST by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

my guess is gas


47 posted on 01/23/2013 11:30:45 AM PST by advertising guy (and as far as the Cookie Monster, was it really cookies ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

You and Obama orchestrated and WANTED the ‘Arab Spring’, Hillary!!!! NOW you complain about security???


48 posted on 01/23/2013 11:30:45 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

This is Wonder Woman, our hero. Without her actions that day, many more lives would have been saved. “Benghazi did not happen in a vacuum”. If the region was so unstable, why was security at a minimum? She wants it both ways.


49 posted on 01/23/2013 11:31:06 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Just wondering. Which approved and passed budgets failed to properly fund security for embassies???


50 posted on 01/23/2013 11:31:16 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Hope and Change has become Attack and Obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: shooter223

shooter..........wait til the shootin


51 posted on 01/23/2013 11:31:50 AM PST by advertising guy (and as far as the Cookie Monster, was it really cookies ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

For me, the highlight thus far was the blatant ass-kissing
Congressman Eliot Engel (NY 17th district) gave Madame Hillary. First left cheek, then right, then left, etc.etc.
We worked very hard to get rid of this umpteen-times re-elected toady to Obama 2 years ago, but he still got his usual 70% of the vote.


52 posted on 01/23/2013 11:32:06 AM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

For me, the highlight thus far was the blatant ass-kissing
Congressman Eliot Engel (NY 17th district) gave Madame Hillary. First left cheek, then right, then left, etc.etc.
We worked very hard to get rid of this umpteen-times re-elected toady to Obama 2 years ago, but he still got his usual 70% of the vote.


53 posted on 01/23/2013 11:32:19 AM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

For me, the highlight thus far was the blatant ass-kissing
Congressman Eliot Engel (NY 17th district) gave Madame Hillary. First left cheek, then right, then left, etc.etc.
We worked very hard to get rid of this umpteen-times re-elected toady to Obama 2 years ago, but he still got his usual 70% of the vote.


54 posted on 01/23/2013 11:32:23 AM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

she is about to smell her own stink


55 posted on 01/23/2013 11:33:03 AM PST by advertising guy (and as far as the Cookie Monster, was it really cookies ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

No shortage of money.


56 posted on 01/23/2013 11:33:10 AM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MomwithHope

I have never seen so many softballs and as$ kissers in my life. No one has ask the hard questions and will some one ask why the survivors of the attack have never been questioned.


57 posted on 01/23/2013 11:33:39 AM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

I have no idea!


58 posted on 01/23/2013 11:33:56 AM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

If a witness is sworn in and lies to a congressional committee, he/she may be prosecuted for perjury. If the witness is not sworn, he cannot face perjury charges but could still theoretically be prosecuted for “making false statements.”


59 posted on 01/23/2013 11:34:10 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Not under oath = no perjury.


60 posted on 01/23/2013 11:34:12 AM PST by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-557 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson