Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barbara Boxer sees carbon tax in the mix ('Sandy' will be catalyst for O's climate change action)
SFGate.com ^ | 1/22/13 | Carolyn Lochhead

Posted on 01/22/2013 1:34:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: NormsRevenge

If there is anybody who knows about spewing foul emissions it’s Barbara Boxer.


21 posted on 01/22/2013 2:51:47 PM PST by PatriotCause (California Sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Tropical Storm Sandy was not a hurricane!
22 posted on 01/22/2013 3:05:57 PM PST by goodtomato (I'm really, really blessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Will someone pass a “Sanity Tax” and “Test” for California politicians?

If I were a psychiatrist working only on California politicians, I would have a job for life and thereafter.

Boxer is to sanity as Charles Manson was to friendly dinner conversation.


23 posted on 01/22/2013 3:22:14 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

Boxer, Feinstein, Pelosi, Sanchez, etc. They make California seem like a gigantic bowl of cereal - Full of nuts, flakes and fruits!

Bon appetit!


24 posted on 01/22/2013 3:25:26 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
someday “people are going to say they had a window to act” on CO2 emissions.

True, because temperatures have peaked in the last decade and the current weak solar cycle has peaked as well. When it gets colder the scammers will get laughed out of the room. The hard core devotees like Hansen will still insist it is getting warmer and keep on adjusting temperatures.

25 posted on 01/22/2013 4:01:59 PM PST by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Never let a crisis go to waste. I imagine the far left celebrates each catastrophe as they plan how to profit from death and destruction.


26 posted on 01/22/2013 4:32:07 PM PST by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
How would these liberals respond to a carbon tax where monies went directly to oil companies to help them modernize.

It's the major stockholders of the oil companies that have been pushing this AGW scam from the beginning.

27 posted on 01/22/2013 5:26:40 PM PST by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
It's the major stockholders of the oil companies that have been pushing this AGW scam from the beginning.

The Oil companies themselves play politics like all big corporations and appear to support this AGW crap but its just a facade. Stockholders? Lots of people including leftist wackos own stock.

28 posted on 01/22/2013 7:15:41 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Stockholders? Lots of people including leftist wackos own stock.

I said "major stockholders" such as the Rockefeller family, the Pew family, the British Royal family, the W. Alton Jones family, even Julie Packard (who has a cool half billion invested in mining methane hydrates), all of whom are "leftist wackos" making money at your expense.

29 posted on 01/22/2013 7:50:29 PM PST by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

so what? People of all stripes own stock including rich people some of who support AGW. What’s your point if there is one?


30 posted on 01/22/2013 8:02:25 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
People of all stripes own stock including rich people some of who support AGW. What’s your point if there is one?

They are the principle donors to the environmental groups that started and maintain the whole gambit. They are the principle grantmakers for the "science" portraying the supposed consequences of AGW. They are also expecting to be BIG beneficiaries of carbon trading, by "virtue" of using carbon dioxide for fracking.

31 posted on 01/22/2013 8:49:07 PM PST by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson