Skip to comments.Health insurance exchange myth, fact (Idaho RINO Governor)
Posted on 01/18/2013 6:25:43 PM PST by narses
From the office of Gov. Butch Otter: Myth - Rejecting a state-run health insurance exchange will ensure Idaho will not be part of any exchange.
Fact The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires every state to have a health insurance exchange. The question is not whether Idaho will have an exchange, but rather who will build and administer the system the federal government or the state. Ignoring the law would invite increased federal involvement in our state affairs through regulation of our insurance markets, forfeiting the creation of jobs in Idaho to other states, adding to the enlargement of the federal bureaucracy and incurring federal fees for operating costs associated with running a federal exchange, such as the current proposal to charge insurance companies a 3.5-percent fee for each policy premium.
Myth Idaho shouldnt participate in establishing an exchange because the federal government will not be able to accomplish creating the federal health insurance exchanges. Let the federal government fail at this process.
Fact The federal government has been working with contractors and vendors since the passage of the bill almost three years ago in preparation for the start date of January 2014. There is now a federal website available in preparation for enrollment in October of 2013 at www.healthcare.gov. Absent a state-run exchange, the state will be connected to a federal exchange.
Myth By choosing a state-based health insurance exchange, the Governor is allowing all of the PPACA or Obamacare to be enacted in Idaho.
Fact Congress passed the PPACA or Obamacare almost three years ago. Several states (including Idaho) sued over the mandate to purchase health insurance. The states lost the lawsuit. The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law. Requirements of the law are now reaching the established timelines for being incorporated into health care and insurance carriers business systems. This is the law of the land and will be adopted whether or not the Governor opts for a state or federal insurance exchange.
Myth There will be no impact to the States businesses if we allow the federal government to run the exchange. Fact Only in a state-run exchange will stakeholders be able to fully participate in the creation and administration of the exchange. As issues arise, businesses and consumers may not have a state presence to address their grievances, make changes or petition the federal government.
Myth There is no flexibility for the state in the administration of a state-run exchange. The federal government will still have all the control.
Fact Idaho currently follows thousands of rules and regulations imposed by the federal government in all aspects of governing the state. Federal/state cooperation is not a new concept. In cooperation with the federal government there are numerous documented areas that the state will have the ability to make decisions in creating and administering the state-run exchange. In addition to those, a state-based exchange will provide Idaho with more control over operational costs, controlling costs to consumers. It will rely on existing state agencies to perform functions they already perform instead of creating duplicate federal functions.
Myth The Idaho Health Freedom Act prevents the Governor or the Legislature from creating a state- based health insurance exchange (SBE).
Fact According to the Idaho Attorney Generals Office report to the Department of Insurance, the Idaho Health Freedom Act (IHFA) predates passage and constitutional review of the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The IHFA is an attempt to override the passage of PPACA and the insurance mandate included therein. Importantly, the IHFA was adopted prior to passage of PPACA and prior to litigation of the overarching issue of constitutionality.
The key to whether the Idaho Health Freedom Act (IHFA) prevents the creation and operation of a SBE is whether the SBE imposes, collects, enforces, or effectuates any penalty under PPACA. In fact, no penalty attends implementation or operation of a State-Based Exchange or Federal Exchange. ... the authority to impose, collect, or enforce a penalty rests exclusively with the I.R.S.
Myth The Governors decision to support a state-run health insurance exchange shows his support of Obamacare.
Fact The Governors intention, by supporting a state-run exchange, is to assert our independence and our commitment to self-determination, while fulfilling our responsibility to the rule of law.
Myth Everyone has to participate in the health insurance exchange.
Fact You do not have to use the state or federal exchange if you are currently covered by health insurance, have Medicare, are currently covered by Medicaid, or choose to purchase insurance outside the exchange. An exchange would assist individuals without health insurance benefits, small businesses needing to pool with other small businesses to cover their employees, those needing to find out if they qualify for Medicaid benefits coverage or would qualify for a federal subsidy to help pay for their health benefits coverage.
Myth It will be better for the state to take a wait-and-see approach to the exchange and opt in at a later date.
Fact By waiting we will miss our opportunity for input during the design and implementation of the exchange. Because of our states rights stance, it is more reasonable to be at the table, negotiating on behalf of our citizens, rather than risk more federal control of our health care and insurance industries.
Fact: A state run exchange is not state controlled. The Feds, in reality, call the shots.
Fact - Gov. Butch Otter is a RINO Progressive Leftist
Good ole Butch is a drunk
If it is such a great idea, then having the Federal Government doing it should be no problem. Since they will be footing the bill, whenever the costs skyrocket and the rules change daily, it is their ugly step-child to administer.
And again, yes!
Whew, again, yes!
Can you ping the Idaho list?
Sadly, the Governor is correct ...
Pity Idaho, I’d always thought they were a liberty loving people.
For years ID had Frank Church in the U.S. Senate destroying national security.
That right there, by itself, is a sad sack state of affairs.
States created the federal government.
“Fact The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires every state to have a health insurance exchange.” ————— I know no one cares about it anymore, but how is this constitutional? There is no authority granted to the feds to run healthcare (or most of what they do). BOTH parties are complicit in creating new and more insidious powers everyday for the feds. It is dangerous and criminal.
Wow, you’re right and I’d forgotten where Frank Church hailed from. Thanks.
Is there any state that hasn’t helped the demise of our republic?
LOL! So true.
GOP_Raider ( http://www.freerepublic.com/~gopraider/ ) used to maintain the Idaho ping list, but he has not posted in over two years. Who maintains it now?
BTW, there is a list of members of the Idaho ping list on GOP_Raider's page (link above) although it's probably outdated.
Lots of crappy, Californians have moved in.
Literally a drunk? Do you have a source for that? Thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.