Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/15/2013 7:17:58 PM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: paltz

The capacity of my magazines is none of the Waddler’s business.


54 posted on 01/15/2013 8:15:32 PM PST by Arm_Bears (Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile has killed more people than my guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

Three thoughts:

1) You first, Jabba. Limit the Capitol Police and you other guards to the same 2-4 round limit you propose for your employers.

2) This is part of the usual anti-gun distraction that the 2nd Amendment is about hunting or self-defense. It isn’t, it IS about defending our liberties against power-tripping statists like YOU. For that, we need full capacity magazines (not “clips” you fat moron), since you and your ilk have the resources of a national army and several police forces at you disposal. In other words, it is about resistance to tyrants like you.

3) Molon Labe!!!


55 posted on 01/15/2013 8:20:35 PM PST by Ancesthntr (Banning guns to prevent crime is like banning cars to prevent drunk driving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

What happens when you’re attacked by five guys? Riddle me that, Nadler, you nincompoop!


56 posted on 01/15/2013 8:22:13 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

What a brain dead stupid statement. We just read about the lady that emptied her revolver on an intruder, and he was still able to run away.

Had there been more than 1 intruder those 6 shots would not have been enough. This POS needs a dose of reality. I wish someone could shut him up. I am sick of hearing and reading about his brain dead stupid comments.

He is full of s#*t.


58 posted on 01/15/2013 8:28:58 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

I’ll bet his security guards have more than 4 shots in their weapons.


60 posted on 01/15/2013 8:29:58 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz; C210N

Before my unfortunate canoe accident where I lost all my guns, I’d keep two MagSafe rounds on top to lessen the chance of others, in the room or house over being shot if I missed or there was over-penetration.

After that, if I needed to keep shooting, my next 10-13 rounds had a bit more punch. If I was limited legally to only four rounds I’d skip the MagSafes without a doubt.


61 posted on 01/15/2013 8:30:53 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. “

Hmmmm....I guess 2 - 3 shots per gun is sufficient for the people to maintain security of a free state?

He is an idiot.


64 posted on 01/15/2013 8:37:14 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

Nadler couldn’t waddle up to his own mailbox, much less hunt.

This fat-ass would starve if he didn’t have someone to go to the grocery store for him.

These idiots have obviously never HEARD of wild dog packs.
Hunters must consider the possibility of wild dog packs while hunting IF they have any sense at all. A good hunter prepares for anything in the wild—But, you can’t expect pansy-assed elitists to understand that.

Pansy-asses! There ought to be a bounty on them.


65 posted on 01/15/2013 8:39:58 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

Hey Nader, tell that to the Korean’s who defended their neighborhood from thugs in the LA riots. If they didn’t have their semi-auto military styled guns and high capacity magazines they would have had their neighborhood looted, robbed and burned down. They would have had their women raped and beaten, their children beaten and murdered and they themselves would have been robbed, murdered or beaten.

Look at how the survivors of Katrina were using their legally owned guns to defend themselves from the criminals and criminal cops who turned feral after the hurricane. Then some ahole libtard government fools rounded up all the legally owned guns and left the criminals in charge.

Any politician who wants to round up my guns needs to come and get them themselves. Don’t be sending in the cops or SWAT. Don’t be ordering it done by the National Guard or the Military. Do it yourself cowards. COME AND GET THEM.

I bet you don’t get mine. Not until you’ve shot me dead.

I’ve already had a talk with my wife about how I’m going to deal with this. She doesn’t like it, but she knows I won’t back down.


67 posted on 01/15/2013 8:40:37 PM PST by History Repeats (sic transit gloria mundi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz
, two or three or four shots should be enough—period.

Tell that to the bad guys Nadler, you freaking moron.

72 posted on 01/15/2013 8:51:31 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (Carry a Gun, It's a Lighter Burden Than Regret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

Nadler is a moron


73 posted on 01/15/2013 8:52:39 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

How about some legislation limiting federal officers and LEO’S to single shot muzzle loaders.....


75 posted on 01/15/2013 9:02:58 PM PST by Kozak (The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

Is Nadler also proposing a law that criminals cannot act in teams of 2 or more?


82 posted on 01/15/2013 9:31:58 PM PST by NonValueAdded (If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you've likely misread the situation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

What if the aggressor is an overweight POS?


84 posted on 01/15/2013 9:34:42 PM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

Two shots might be enough, or maybe four, or maybe four more. It never happens like you imagine it. The imagined rapist turns out to be a gang of rapists. How many shots do you need then? Six is a good round number, fills most cylinders on most revolvers, but sometimes there are seven or eight thugs hanging out where you must walk. Figure that the products of leftist culture, drug addicts, gang bangers, hip hopping thugs, union thugs, Democrats are often so crazed one bullet won’t work, and where two are needed, three are better, so the magazine that holds the most is the best.


86 posted on 01/15/2013 9:39:47 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz
“But let me say, yes,” Nadler added. “One of the definitions of a nation state is that the state has a monopoly on legitimate violence. And the state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence.”
88 posted on 01/15/2013 9:53:05 PM PST by mykroar ("I'm afraid I can't use a mule. I have several hundred up on Capitol Hill." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

Nadlers comments are proof positive that term limits should be mandatory. Howabout 2 shots at the job Nadler and then you have to back to working for a living!


91 posted on 01/15/2013 10:04:47 PM PST by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

If Rep. Waddler gets his way, all you have to do to commit a crime is bring five partners.


92 posted on 01/15/2013 10:09:01 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Our economy won't heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz
Dear idiot Nadler,
No one ever wants to use a gun to protect their life or the lives of those around them.

If you have to use a gun to protect life there are very few rules but one must follow them to survive.

#1. Shoot First

#2 Shoot Most

#3 Shoot Best

#4 Survive

Who in the he11 do you think you are to be telling everyone what the limitations are in protecting their lives???

What an arrogant a$$ you really are. Have you ever been in a situation where you had to pull a trigger to defend your life or a loved ones life??

Arrogant POS who just knows it all..... And by the way My rights are granted to me by the constitution and what you think doesn't count at all.

94 posted on 01/15/2013 10:38:28 PM PST by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paltz

not if you miss, and not if there’s multiple attackers.

libtards think they know all/scenarios, like they’re god. i hate it when libtards play god.


96 posted on 01/15/2013 10:41:41 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson