Sounds a lot like male FReepers.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Humans are not perfect.
This news flash brought to you courtesy of a hefty government grant.
2 posted on
01/15/2013 5:21:50 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Nothing will change until after the war.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
A big leg woman ain’t got no soul.
3 posted on
01/15/2013 5:23:18 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
No surprise on this forum.
4 posted on
01/15/2013 5:24:24 AM PST by
henkster
("The people who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
As most of these “studies” it is a complete fraud. The “study” was not about court cases. No one was in a courtroom during a real trial.
Pictures were shown to men outside of a courtroom. Telling them that it was about a trial does not make it about a trial.
As with all these “studies” idiots will apply the false results to real life with stupid consequences.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
6 posted on
01/15/2013 5:28:19 AM PST by
sickoflibs
(Losing to O is NO principle!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
... more likely to find overweight women guilty of ... what?
7 posted on
01/15/2013 5:29:27 AM PST by
svxdave
(Life is too short to wear a fake Rolex.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
... more likely to find overweight women guilty of ... what?
8 posted on
01/15/2013 5:29:33 AM PST by
svxdave
(Life is too short to wear a fake Rolex.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I’m 100% certain that someone who would apply for a grant to determine whether men are sexist is going to find that the data shows that men are sexist.
This is what comes of results oriented studies in the humanities.
Has there ever been a hypothesis in the humanities that has not been supported by the grant funded research? I don’t think so.
Why even do the research (assuming that they actually do). Just write up your assumptions and publish it as fact.
9 posted on
01/15/2013 5:32:56 AM PST by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Of course them damn fatties be guilty as hell.
You know I'm right.
(lol)
11 posted on
01/15/2013 5:39:07 AM PST by
SIDENET
(I've drawn my line in the sand.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Can we get some “NOT GUILTY” pictures, please?
13 posted on
01/15/2013 5:41:02 AM PST by
SIDENET
(I've drawn my line in the sand.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Can’t say that I blame them.
14 posted on
01/15/2013 5:44:34 AM PST by
BobL
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Casey Anthony wasn’t one ounce overweight, I did not attend the trial, but I would gladly drop a pellet on her.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Overweight females ARE guilty. Duh.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
But when the male pretend peers pronounced judgment on the fake female defendants ...I couldn't get the past the "pretend peers" and "fake females" in this article. "Science," indeed.
19 posted on
01/15/2013 5:48:52 AM PST by
Tax-chick
(Please explain how my being in a fuss would help the situation.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
22 posted on
01/15/2013 5:53:43 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Also in the study: transvestite wookies are guilty.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
And women vote for men like Clinton and Obama because of perceived charm etc. Equally wrong and unjust.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
The writers from Married....With Children are only wishing this study would have come out 20 years ago.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Not-so-scientific FR Poll:
1. 
Guilty
Not Guilty
2. 
3. 
27 posted on
01/15/2013 6:11:36 AM PST by
WVKayaker
("the sacrifice of One birthed opportunity for new life and real HOPE for all"-Sarah Palin 12/17/12)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Robert Bork, who served as a tank commander in Korea during the Korean War (and was grilled by certain Senate Democrats for taking a leave from law school to do so) said that if he were innocent he would prefer a court-martial, if he were guilty, he would prefer a civilian jury.
I believe that women jurors are far more prone to acquit, in general, than men.
And what about the Menendez brothers batting their eyelashs at female jurors?
Gimme a break!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
