Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wyoming lawmakers push gun control exemption
Casper Star Tribune ^ | 1/11/13 | Associated Press

Posted on 01/11/2013 7:07:48 PM PST by rwh

CHEYENNE — Some Wyoming lawmakers are pushing to pre-empt any federal crackdown on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines in the aftermath of last month's school shooting in Connecticut.

A bill pending in the Wyoming Legislature would specify that any federal limitation on guns would be unenforceable. It also would make it a state felony for federal agents to try to enforce restrictions.

The bill comes as Vice President Joe Biden is set to deliver gun-control proposals to President Barack Obama on Tuesday. Obama has said reducing gun violence is a top priority following the massacre of 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school.

Rep. Kendell Kroeker, R-Evansville, is the bill's main sponsor. Seven others in the Wyoming House and two state senators have also signed on as sponsors out of 90 total state lawmakers.

Kroeker said Thursday he expects Washington will push its current gun-control effort as far as it can. The Obama administration has made it clear it's considering proposals including a ban on sales of assault weapons, limits on high-capacity ammunition magazines and universal background checks for gun buyers.

"I think there are a lot of people who would want to take all of our guns if they could," Kroeker said. "And they're only restrained by the opposition of the people, and other lawmakers who are concerned about our rights."

Kroeker said it's clear to him that Wyoming has authority to make it a crime for federal agents to try to enforce a federal gun ban in the state. He noted state resistance to illegal federal measures dates back to opposition to the federal Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798.

"We're a sovereign state with our own constitutional form of government," Kroeker said. "We've got a right to make our laws, and if the federal government is going to try to enforce unconstitutional laws on our people and take away the rights of Wyoming citizens, then we as a state are going to step up and make that a crime."

Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, is a co-sponsor of the bill. He said Thursday his constituents are "absolutely terrified" of the prospect of federal gun restrictions.

Hicks said Wyoming legislators are getting emails from all over the country in support of the bill. He said many residents of other states are saying they intend to urge their own legislators to follow suit.

"Even if Congress doesn't do this, given the statements from the president, they will surely try to restrict firearms ownership through executive order," Hicks said. "I think that's the biggest threat we're facing."

Although Wyoming has one of the highest rates of per-capita firearms ownership of any state, it's also among the lowest in gun violence.

"Part of it's our culture," Hicks said. "Our kids grow up around firearms, and they also grow up hunting, and they know what the consequences are of taking a life. And they know at an early age, whether you hunt or fish, that there's consequences from pulling that trigger. We're not insulated from the real world in Wyoming."

Rep. James Byrd, D-Cheyenne, said he's opposed to the legislation. "If you want to pick a fight with the feds, let's pick a fight with the feds that's about something that means something," he said.

Byrd said he believes that if Wyoming passes the bill into law, it will lose in the federal courts.

While Byrd said he's an adamant supporter of the Second Amendment, he said of the bill's sponsors, "These are the same people that want a gun in everybody's pocket all the way down to the cradle."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; banglist; statesrights; wyoming
There is a little bit more information in this article than what was posted yesterday. Rep. Kendell Kroeker seems to have his head on straight.
1 posted on 01/11/2013 7:07:53 PM PST by rwh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rwh
Rep. James Byrd, D-Cheyenne, said he's opposed to the legislation. "If you want to pick a fight with the feds, let's pick a fight with the feds that's about something that means something," he said.

So destroying a Constitutional right doesn't mean anything to him?

2 posted on 01/11/2013 7:22:39 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Not sure these “special exemptions” help the Country.


3 posted on 01/11/2013 7:25:18 PM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
Not sure these “special exemptions” help the Country.

Anything that goes against this dictatorship will help!

4 posted on 01/11/2013 7:33:20 PM PST by MountainDad (Support your local Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono; All
So destroying a Constitutional right doesn't mean anything to him?

Nailed it.

5 posted on 01/11/2013 7:35:30 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

when upper levels of government ignore the constitution it is the duty of lesser magistrates to protect and enforce it. the whole point of the constitution is to limit government as to what it can do. when government ignores it it says we have no limits, so state governments, many who have much of the us constituion in their own state constituions, step in and say, not so fast, there.


6 posted on 01/11/2013 7:59:53 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rwh
Just this might be the first really kick in the ass King Obama will be getting. He is treading on our freedom and most of us do not take that lightly. The rest of the sheep will starve after the free stuff quits as King Obama feeds his bank account.
7 posted on 01/11/2013 8:02:01 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwh

Guess I need to move 11 miles north and live in a state that’s still American


8 posted on 01/11/2013 8:04:49 PM PST by JD91
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwh

Guess I need to move 11 miles north and live in a state that’s still American


9 posted on 01/11/2013 8:05:05 PM PST by JD91
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MountainDad

I believe the support for Obamacare exemptions facilitated its passage.


10 posted on 01/11/2013 8:14:13 PM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rwh; ForGod'sSake
Byrd said he believes that if Wyoming passes the bill into law, it will lose in the federal courts.

And Wyoming would take seriously the decision of a court which is a branch of the other litigant because.....? Obviously federal courts have no ethical/moral legitimacy and shouldn't even have the facade of legal authority in cases where the federal government is one of the parties. For heaven's sake, they make judges and jurors recuse themselves if they so much as KNOW one of the parties, let alone if they were EMPLOYED by them. Of course, that begs the question of who would decide state vs. federal questions, because we obviously don't want to be taking it to the UN or some sort of international court populated by tin pot dictators and thugs.

The only idea I've come up with would be to have it be a panel of jurists from other state courts. That way they're not directly beholden to either of the parties, states have a slight built-in advantage as should be, but a state doing something truly out of line still wouldn't be able to get away with it.

11 posted on 01/11/2013 9:21:58 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwh
"We're a sovereign state with our own constitutional form of government," Kroeker said. "We've got a right to make our laws, and if the federal government is going to try to enforce unconstitutional laws on our people and take away the rights of Wyoming citizens, then we as a state are going to step up and make that a crime."

Oh, yeah!

12 posted on 01/11/2013 10:46:05 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Dear Texas:

I plan to emigrate to Wyoming instead of your state. I get to keep my armaments, and, I do not have to pay Spanish companies to build roads for the Communist Chinese because of the taxpayer funded NAFTA Superhighway nonsense

Regards

An American


13 posted on 01/12/2013 5:44:59 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (The only automatic weapon is the one Obama uses to take your paycheck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

Just another reason I love Wyoming, not mention they have no state taxes and great hunting and fishing.


14 posted on 01/12/2013 7:50:09 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson