Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Phillips 66 moving Bakken oil by rail in $1B deal
Fuel Fix ^ | January 9, 2013 | Zain Shauk

Posted on 01/09/2013 8:51:51 AM PST by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2013 8:51:58 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Who is it again, who’s been investing in railroad companies? I think it’s some sort of Buffet or restaraunt company with deep pockets and political influence?


2 posted on 01/09/2013 8:56:55 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Well, that’s certainly much better than trying to move it through some stupid pipeline where it would get handled a lot less. Thankfully trains never derail whereas pipelines are rupturing almost hourly. Lucky there were no rail cars on the ferry that just crashed in NYC huh?

Molon labe!


3 posted on 01/09/2013 8:58:27 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Who is it again, who’s been investing in railroad companies? .................................Bingo! My thoughts exactly, one of the benefits of being an insider in Gov’t.. Follow the $$$ see who is cashing in on the deal. Someone is having their pockets lined for sure.


4 posted on 01/09/2013 9:00:04 AM PST by Bringbackthedraft (Who we elect is not as important as who they bring in with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Maybe I should look for a bump in that PSX stock.


5 posted on 01/09/2013 9:00:32 AM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Interesting. There’s an extensive rail network in place around BayWay. It pretty packed in though with the storage tanks and residential area of Elizabeth though so perhaps there’s no room to make a depot to offload the oil from the rail cars directly.

Definitely good news for this area of New Jersey.

Come back home to the refinery
Hiring man said “son if it was up to me”


6 posted on 01/09/2013 9:02:31 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Warren Buffett owns his-self an entire railroad. His secretary also pays a higher tax rate than he does. Or at least until they fixed that with the fiscal cliffy thingie, taxing just those evil billionares!


7 posted on 01/09/2013 9:04:08 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Stupid pipelines make WAY too much economic sense for the Current Regime to seriously consider construction. The White Hut’s “business model” is to make commercial operations so expensive and uncompetitive as to drive out any other future investment from commercial sources.

Then, of course, they step in to provide “venture capital” as a prelude for an excuse to later nationalize that particular industry. Of course, you understand, only failing industries get that sort of “assistance”.

Oil pipelines are not sufficiently close to failing just yet.


8 posted on 01/09/2013 9:16:45 AM PST by alloysteel (Bronco Bama - the cowboy who whooped up and widened the stampede.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

100 rail tank cars every day ?


9 posted on 01/09/2013 9:18:11 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I wish Freepers would actually research the facts before mouthing off about topics they do not understand. Phillips 66’s deal involves a single-line movement by Canadian Pacific Railway from North Dakota to a barge dock in Albany, NY, then downriver to Bayway, New Jersey.

http://www.progressiverailroading.com/canadian_pacific/article/Global-Partners-Canadian-Pacific-to-transport-Bakken-crude-for-Phillips-66—34798#

BNSF handles crude oil from North Dakota to eastern connections at Chicago (CSXT and Norfolk Southern) bound for northeastern refineries as well. I’m unaware of any pipelines being proposed from the Bakken region to the Northeast. Furthermore, Bakken production far exceeds any proposed future pipeline capacity to Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana, so the rail option is needed regardless.


10 posted on 01/09/2013 9:21:44 AM PST by railroader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: railroader

I’d bet on a 50-60 day round trip for the cars. To do 50,000 bbls/day requires loading 100 cars every day.

At some point, they will run out of rail cars because every tank car in the US will be “in service” or returning to reload.


11 posted on 01/09/2013 9:55:52 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: railroader

“The oil will be moved by rail from North Dakota to a terminal in Albany, N.Y., where it will be loaded onto barges and shipped down the Hudson River to the Bayway refinery”

Most people ASSUME that the only railroad moving out of ND is the BNSF. This is not the first deal like this. JD Irving made a deal similar to this to bring Balkan oil to his refinery in St. John, New Brunswick on the Atlantic Ocean. I believe that also is being shipped across Canada on the CPRS.

What they really need is a canal from Buffalo to Albany that could handle barge traffic off the Great Lakes. (sarc)


12 posted on 01/09/2013 10:08:44 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: railroader
Bakken production far exceeds any proposed future pipeline capacity to Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana

Bakken Oil production has reached 682,393 BPD.

https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/stats/historicalbakkenoilstats.pdf

The completed Keystone XL by Transcanada would add 510,000 BPD.

Bakken Crude Express Pipeline by ONEOK Partners will add 200,000 BPD.

Steelman pipeline project by Enbridge will carry 145,000 BPD.

Other pipelines are in various planning stages as well.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/797881-investment-potential-in-bakken-pipeline-takeaway-infrastructure

13 posted on 01/09/2013 10:09:31 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

They will make more rail cars.


14 posted on 01/09/2013 10:10:28 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Not this specific project but enlarging in ND:

BNSF increases Bakken oil-hauling capacity to 1 million barrels a day
http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/bnsf-increases-bakken-oil-hauling-capacity-to-million-barrels-a/article_15b99d84-76e1-58fc-9f35-143449300a1d.html#ixzz2HVH3z0Vp


15 posted on 01/09/2013 10:24:09 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney
The completed Keystone XL by Transcanada would add 510,000 BPD.

Trans Canada's Keystone XL Pipeline is designed to transport crude oil from Alberta, not North Dakota, to the Gulf Coast.

In addition, Bakken formation production may peak at 1 million BPD then decline steadily after that. The huge investment in pipelines may prove unnecessary, especially since a large portion of that production will go to northeastern US refineries.

16 posted on 01/09/2013 10:24:42 AM PST by railroader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blackdog; Bringbackthedraft
Mr. Buffett owns Burlington Northern. This movement is on the Canadian Pacific.

The free market is so unfair.

17 posted on 01/09/2013 10:25:52 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I’d bet on a 50-60 day round trip for the cars. To do 50,000 bbls/day requires loading 100 cars every day.

Crude oil moves in 100-car unit trains. This eliminates the need to classify and re-classify at several yards between origin and destination. Turnaround time should be more like two weeks.
18 posted on 01/09/2013 10:29:57 AM PST by railroader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: railroader

The Keystone XL includes loading points for the Bakken area.

It certainly would move a lot of Alberta oil/bitumen, but it plans to move oil out of ND as well.

There are several other pipelines planned as well, not to mention the majority of the Bakken Crude moves out on existing pipelines already.


19 posted on 01/09/2013 10:30:21 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
That's what mergers and acquisitions are for...........

Good point though for the sake of fairness.

20 posted on 01/09/2013 10:33:32 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson