[null and void]

Make of this what you will.

Consider the source, consider that it isn't welcome on FR.

Consider the implications if it is accurate...

[thackney]

Consider the source

Thanks. Considering no one talked about it until after the shooting occurred, I consider the reputation of the source as deserved.

Cheers

[svcw]

Jones thrives on conspiracies, which all have just a smidgen of believability. It is who he is and what he does, there is nothing to little that is actual truth.

[Sherman Logan]

Makes perfect sense to me. United Way planned the attacks.

Or, possibly, somebody fiddled with the image.

Or, there was a glitch that caused the date to come up inaccurately.

Which of the three would Occam’s Razor say is least likely?

[gdani]

Make of this what you will.

Consider the source, consider that it isn't welcome on FR.

Consider the implications if it is accurate...

Of course, the most logical and most likely answer is that United Way, from their HQ down to this local office in Connecticut, is engaged in a massive conspiracy, probably took part in the "shootings" themselves, and it probably all has to do with The War on Christmas(tm). Or something like that. I'm still working on that part.

Is it not the only explanation at this point?!?!

(Really, this was exactly the type of kookery I referenced in my first post).

[RummyChick]

Have you ever watched the show Spooks ? Called MI5 in the US. I watched it on Netflix.

It is pretty negative about the US..but also government officials in general.

Maybe it is all over the top.

BUT..I don’t doubt some of it happens to some extent.

[Gluteus Maximus]

Like I said, it has many of the markings of a false flag operation. The laughing actor getting into his character as grieving parent is indeed troubling.

I wonder what the significance, if any, of the term "Sandy" is. My gut tells me it's some sort of marketing slogan for something.

Also, the Arizona, Colorado and Connecticut shooters all share a MK Ultra profile. Were they MK Ultra? I wish that I could dismiss the notion out of hand, but there's too much there to ignore.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

Thanks for the link. There's got to be a computer-related explanation. A strange thing happened in my favor recently.

1. My favorite cereal normally sells for $9+ a box but someone had removed the price from the shelf;
2. an employee took a box up front and scanned it.. 1/2 the usual price. Must be a mistake I "protested." No mistake, he said.
3. So I bought five boxes
4. but still wondering because
   • no where in the store,
   • in their weekly ad,
   • or on their web site
   was there mention of this item.
5. None of the employees I talked to had a clue.

Today I noticed that the supermarket was in the process of completely reorganizing the cereal aisle. The place where my $9+ cereal used to be now had the same brand and type but a much smaller box that was marked on the shelf exactly the price I paid yesterday for a box of the $9+ size.

So I am guessing that the brand and type is computer linked to shelf location to get the current (this morning's) price and someone updated the computer before they got the aisle reorganized. The people doing the work seemed in a bit of a hurry.

That was human error. This is likely google error.

[Truth2012]

I saw that earlier today and I looked around on google myself, and there it was- how weird is that? AND then combined with the Facebook page for sympathy notes, four days before.

They must want us to figure it out. II am dumbfounded that anyone believes the media/government story, myself.

The school nurse and the medical examiner sealed it for me.

[Salamander]

That red pill is one bitter little bitch, innit?

[edcoil]

Could it be that date on the computer was incorrect causing it to appear to be 4 days earlier?