Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory

those who took out mortgages still owe what they borrowed


10 posted on 01/02/2013 2:14:04 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

One of the goals of the Marxists is to invalidate contract law. Credit will then become unavailable.


11 posted on 01/02/2013 2:16:15 PM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL; abb
those who took out mortgages still owe what they borrowed

This bears repeating:

Those Who Took Out Mortgages Still Owe What They Borrowed

Unless those foreclosed upon can prove that they were in compliance with the major terms of the mortgage...including all the repayments terms...they should not get the houses back or any other form of compensation.

12 posted on 01/02/2013 2:33:30 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (When Robbing Peter To Pay Paul,One Can Always Count On Paul's Cooperation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

those who took out mortgages still owe what they borrowed

Of course, assuming the real owner can be determined. These lenders thought they were above the law. A very small percentage are being held to it. The lender rights the contract, if they don’t like the results, it’s their own fault. Now if only actual people who committed fraud in the robo signing scandal would actually do real time.


17 posted on 01/02/2013 2:57:17 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

those who took out mortgages still owe what they borrowed
***********************************************
YES , but to whom? There is no record of any sale or transfer ,, some mortgages have been traced to having been sold over 600 times (not a typo).


30 posted on 01/03/2013 3:36:17 AM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

fraud in the factum.

If the transaction was born in fraud it is void not just voidable.

the apraisal was knowingly manipulated in order to induce fraud in the application process.

If the house was valued properly, would consideration to the promissory note resale profit, then the price would have been lower.

Remember the product was NOT the real estate, the product was the paper. The land and buyer were mere collateral damage.


39 posted on 01/03/2013 2:56:37 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson