[adorno]

Why? The 2nd amendment says nothing about heavy background and psychological tests.

The 2nd amendment also does not mention anything about deranged or psychologically damaged people. It also doesn't mention anything about people with criminal histories being able to own guns.

The 2nd amendment can stand as written, but there has to be some rules for dangerous people not being able to get them.

The background and psychological screens would not be done for the general population. It would be just for those who are charged with heavy responsibilities where crowds are gathered, especially groups of children.

[Candor7]

The 2nd amendment also does not mention anything about deranged or psychologically damaged people>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Correct. And the right to defend one’s life does not depend on anyone proving they are NOT crazy.People are assumed to be sane. Teachers who are hired by a schoolboards are assumed to be sane.

As a matter of fact, despite yout faulty logic, you also are assumed to be sane.

And there should be no “comprehensive” tests or checks on any teacher who wants to have the benefit of being armed.There should be training however, and periodic qualification of training standards.

Even conservatives these days find it challenging not to be liberals who think the world has to proove itself sane before anyone in it can even get a bus ticket.