Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe

He is entitled to his opinion as wrong as it is.

His being the Judge at the Giffords trial means nothing to me and should mean nothing to anyone else.
He expresses himself as one man, one man who has a right to an opinion as do I.

His trying to use his office as though he should be considered an expert should mean no more than the opinion of any other American, but simply exposes his bias, and Judges should not be biased.


12 posted on 12/21/2012 7:02:20 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Venturer

This is a sitting federal judge who has stated a bias against the Second Amendment. Having stated that bias publicly, he should recuse himself from every case that involves firearms from now until doomsday...which obviously wasn’t today.


23 posted on 12/21/2012 7:14:41 PM PST by MestaMachine (It's the !!!!TREASON!!!!, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer
His being the Judge at the Giffords trial means nothing to me and should mean nothing to anyone else.

Actually I find that part particularly ironic. By all rights Loughner should have been locked up as a public menace long before this happened. The justice system shirked it's responsibility because of his relationship to a public official. That made him our problem, and if they're going to make him our problem we're entitled to the tools we deem fit to deal with it. IMHO.

27 posted on 12/21/2012 7:19:11 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson