No, in no way did I mean to insult you, WoC, but as more information comes out about the massacre we see an increased defense of the Turk’s action against a defenseless population of dhimmi Christians.
Please accept my apology if I offended you.
RE: insults
It's not a big deal and there was only one that I took as a possible insult to me (asking if I excused Islamist genocide); I was thinking more of the "filthy Turks are genocidal maniacs" remark.
Where have you encountered such people? Are Germans today filthy Nazis and genocidal maniacs? Are the Kurds filthy and genocidal? To wit, "500,000 Armenians Said To Have Perished. Washington Asked to Stop Slaughter of Christians by Turks and Kurds." The New York Times September 24, 1915.
I doubt that anyone will read the rest but I am posting it anyway.. some of it I posted before.
I have read in the past Turkish government statements agreeing that the killing of the Armenians was horrendous but they will not declare it a genocide. (The way that I read this is Turkey understands how critical "genocide" is for Armenia's efforts to get territory and money from the modern Republic of Turkey -- as I understand post-W.W.I history it was the victorious Allies who set the boundaries of modern Turkey -- so why blame modern Turkey for taking Armenian territory?)
Nothing excuses what happened to the Armenians nor does it excuse any crimes of the OTTOMAN EMPIRE.
As for the word "genocide".. IMO
-- especially the demands of both Armenia and the Armenian diaspora here in the U.S. that the United States of America adopt resolution after resolution condemning Turkey for genocide when both Armenia and the Armenian diaspora here in the U.S. apparently know that Recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Turkey is a secondary issue ( interview with Harut Sassounian an Armenian living in southern California).
[Excerpt ]"The real purpose of the resolution is not recognition of the Armenian Genocide, but a political struggle the issue of which side has a larger political capital in Washington. . . . [T]he admission of the Armenian Genocide by Turkey is an issue of secondary importance for us. . . . our lands were seized and our 3,000-year-old culture was destroyed. . . . Therefore, our true demand is compensation for this injustice. . . . Now specialists must study the lawyers advice and decide which issue should be submitted to which court, as there is the International Court of Justice, European Court of Human Rights, US Federal Courts, etc. This is a most important issue. It must be studied with all seriousness, because, if we lose in court, Turkey will claim that Armenians have no legal demands."
There is general agreement among western scholars that over 500,000 Armenians died between 1914 and 1918 [end of W.W.I]; other estimates vary between 600,000 to 1,500,000.
I am not a historian but I can read and there is a hell of a lot more to this issue than screaming insults at Modern Turkey
for the crimes of the OTTOMAN EMPIRE -- wait to see if the AK Party gets away with converting the modern Republic of Turkey to an Islamic "Republic" then scream at them.