Even CA doesn’t require gun owners to be licensed.
Quit propping up your majority of liberal moochers and parasites.
I have already determined in my own mind that certain laws require disobedience by a cognizant man.
Can't say anything more than that.
“Did you really think we want those laws observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them to be broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against... We’re after power and we mean it... There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.”
From Atlas Shrugged
There is an order for laws.
1. God’s law
2. Natural Law
3. The Constitution (original intent)
4. Sate Law
5. Local Law
Obey the higher laws over the lower laws.
You may have to face consequences for disobedience. That’s a matter of your own conscience.
At AresArmor.com you can build a gun from parts and don’t even need a license to have it.
That which is licensed is not a right; but rather, is a privilege. And privileges can be taken away as easily as they may be granted.
Hell, I can remember when one of the hardware stores in the (formerly) small town I grew up in had a rack of shotguns out on the sales floor. Chained but there.
Whatever happened to that once-sane state?