Skip to comments.
Amsterdam's legal brothels are a brutal lesson for Britain : sex gangs and race
Daily Mail ^
| 23 November 2012
| Sue Reid
Posted on 12/01/2012 11:34:53 PM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
full title.
A feminist revolution that cruelly backfired - and why Amsterdam's legal brothels are a brutal lesson for Britain about telling the truth on sex gangs and race
1
posted on
12/01/2012 11:35:01 PM PST
by
george76
To: george76
Hard-line criminal behaviour ...Well, let's not be hasty!
2
posted on
12/01/2012 11:38:02 PM PST
by
dr_lew
To: george76
ROP at it again.....why is anyone surprised????
3
posted on
12/01/2012 11:44:06 PM PST
by
Nifster
To: george76; All
And what is preventing the Dutch government from cracking down on this blatant criminal behavior? Or are certain people getting the same payoffs they got when it was illegal?
4
posted on
12/01/2012 11:47:03 PM PST
by
gleeaikin
To: george76
Libertarians will explain how this is fine, 1780 Americans were fine with this as long as they are consenting adults.
5
posted on
12/01/2012 11:49:19 PM PST
by
ansel12
(The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
To: george76; All
Also, an important point in the article is that the Dutch have women going to the schools telling the girls who and what to avoid to keep from being entrapped. This is in contrast to Britain where they are too prudish to go to schools and warn the girls about the same type of entrapment activity.
6
posted on
12/01/2012 11:51:18 PM PST
by
gleeaikin
To: george76
7
posted on
12/02/2012 12:06:42 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(I don't want to live on this planet anymore.)
To: wastedyears
Well, Muslims... Libertarians.
8
posted on
12/02/2012 12:24:31 AM PST
by
ansel12
(The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
To: george76
Isn’t prostitution one of those “victimless crimes”?
9
posted on
12/02/2012 12:30:57 AM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: ansel12
Oh bullcrap. They wouldn’t be allright with it, and you need to quit projecting your frustration with candy ass Republicans on them.
At the very least, they, unlike our guys, far more often don’t fold like a cheap suit when the pressure rises and stick to their guns. The only thing they screw up is not making clear that with great gobs of freedom, you get to pay for the consequences of your actions yourself...
10
posted on
12/02/2012 12:38:16 AM PST
by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
Amsterdam may be loose on morality, but thought it was pretty damn serious about the rules.
May the perps suffer a late night, fatal equestrian thumping...
11
posted on
12/02/2012 12:38:36 AM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: george76
Who are the John’s?...
Must be a lot of John’s..
12
posted on
12/02/2012 12:38:47 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: Axenolith
Sorry, what is it about the Dutch that make them superior to free people? To Americans? To Texans?
13
posted on
12/02/2012 12:43:08 AM PST
by
ansel12
(The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
To: ansel12
I image you mean Libertarians and not libertarians.
Everyone’s sense of govt lies somewhere between libertarianism and statism. And the greatest amount evil occurs on the end of statism; the point at which Mussolini, Mao, Stalin, and Hitler realized their greatest accomplishments.
14
posted on
12/02/2012 12:44:43 AM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: Gene Eric
I naturally, always mean libertarians embrace evil, evil is yours, not America’s.
15
posted on
12/02/2012 12:55:05 AM PST
by
ansel12
(The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
To: ansel12
Of course you're free to invent definitions, but the following are from the New Oxford American dictionary:
statism: a political system in which the state has substantial centralized control over social and economic affairs.
libertarianism: an extreme laissez-faire political philosophy advocating only minimal state intervention in the lives of citizens.
The two oppose each other as I mentioned in my previous post. And the real evil IS on the end statism end whether or not you choose to acknowledge that.
I value Free Republic's attitude about facts. Let's keep it that way, and not conflate the Libertarian Party's agenda with the true meaning of the word?
16
posted on
12/02/2012 1:08:15 AM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: Gene Eric
Here is the leftists agenda hidden behind the Libertarian Party curtain.
Libertarian Party Platform:
Throw open the borders completely; only a rare individual (terrorist, disease carrier etc.) can be kept from freedom of movement through political boundaries.
Homosexuals; total freedom in the military, gay marriage, adoption, child custody and everything else.
Abortion; zero restrictions or impediments.
Pornography; no restraint, no restrictions.
Drugs; Meth, Heroin, Crack, and anything new that science can come up with, zero restrictions.
Advertising those drugs, prostitution, and pornography; zero restrictions.
Military Strength; minimal capabilities.
17
posted on
12/02/2012 1:13:45 AM PST
by
ansel12
(The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
To: Gene Eric
Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Then stop doing it.
18
posted on
12/02/2012 1:20:24 AM PST
by
ansel12
(The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
To: ansel12
You're absolutely correct -- the LP platform is completely #d up; ergo, my question about the noun vs the proper noun.
There's no real way to contrast conservatism from statism. There are many Conservatives that want the govt to apply "conservative" law, and others that don't. Conservatism is essentially the opposite of leftism, not the opposite of libertarianism.
The following is an adaptation of a typical political orientation graph. I'm somewhere between conservatism and libertarianism. The parenthetical terms are mine, but the
ism points are generally accepted in the realm of political analysis.
Statism
(despots) /\ (no comment)
/ \
/ \
Leftism / \ Conservatism
\ /
\ /
(Liberals) \ / (Founding Fathers)
\/
Libertarianism
19
posted on
12/02/2012 1:37:10 AM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: ansel12
libertarians are not conservative
they confuse liberty and license for one
20
posted on
12/02/2012 1:39:27 AM PST
by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson