Sakic doesn’t know the difference between bloggers who show screencaps of Hawaii statutes and post photos and scans directly from government documents, email communications with government officials, etc.... and “opinions”.
You mentioned that if a story has documentation you’ll look at it. I’ve posted proof that the 1960-64 birth index at the HDOh contains names from legally non-valid BC’s. I’ve posted communications directly from the HDOH showing that their accounting for the certificate numbers and dates filed don’t work. I’ve posted Bennett’s actual request, the laws that govern Onaka’s response, and Onaka’s response. I’ve posted KS SOS Kris Kobach’s actual request and the response he got.
This sakic is either a troll, or so stupid that he doesn’t know the difference between primary sources and “rumors”. My guess is he’s a troll; his behavior just smells like a troll.
For instance, the literary biography comes straight from the person named. These are Obama’s claims about himself. And sakic thinks that a 2009, admittedly-altered, version of a 1999 article from the New York Times has more credibility than the literary biography that came straight from the usurper’s mouth and was allowed to stand until 2007, when it was changed as already proven by paper documents showing the earlier version.
Primary v secondary sources. This guy wants to waste your time over sources when he can’t even show us that a SECONDARY source claiming a HI birth PRIMARY source (Obama’s own claims about himself) from 2007 claiming a Kenyan birth.
Somehow my comment got truncated. He can’t show that a SECONDARY source pre-dating 2004 and claiming a HI birth even exists, but ignores that we’ve got a paper copy of a PRIMARY source (Obama’s own claims about himself) from 2007 claiming a Kenyan birth.
So nasty for someone asked if he would like to make a friendly wager that would benefit FR no matter who is right. I will depart the discussion on my own, but if you change your mind, PM me.