Skip to comments.
A Possible Republican Strategy for the Fiscal Cliff (Force Obama to blink)
American Thinker ^
| 11/30/2012
| Bruce Thompson
Posted on 11/30/2012 8:26:23 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: SeekAndFind
I like it..shove it right back in his face...
Blame your predessor (it's you!..you B@$t@rd :)
2
posted on
11/30/2012 8:30:55 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Anger a Conservative by telling a lie; Anger a Liberal by telling the truth....RWR 8-)
To: SeekAndFind
President Obama is legally required to deliver a budget in January. What that would do is force him to commit his budget to paper. Seriously??
3
posted on
11/30/2012 8:32:18 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
To: SeekAndFind
The fraudulently elected person who occupies the White House has a history of blaming everybody else and does nothing positive. In that, he is a product of his generation - NEVER accept responsibility.
And to think he will not run again, in violation of the Constitution, is ludicrous. He has almost absolute power; he will not surrender it peacefully or willingly.
4
posted on
11/30/2012 8:38:31 AM PST
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: SeekAndFind
We have two choices now. Go over the "cliff" or don't.
If we avoid the cliff, it's clear that Obama will only agree to do so with tax hikes and fake promises for future spending cuts that will never happen. We saw this a year ago; same old same old, see you again at the next cliff when the debt ceiling is inevitably reached.
If we go over, we get massive tax hikes and massive spending cuts. Obama will likely try to cover his rear by trimming the tax hikes with a middle class cut. The rest would stand.
Honestly, it looks to me like the choice is tax hikes with fake spending cuts or tax hikes with actual spending cuts. I'm starting to think the cliff is the better choice for the long term. Lots of short term pain though.
5
posted on
11/30/2012 8:39:58 AM PST
by
pepsi_junkie
(Who is John Galt?)
To: NTHockey
Just wait . . . they’ll start prepping and priming Michelle to run in 2016. 8 More Years. Woman. And Black. And O’s Wife. IF being First Lady qualified Hillary in the eyes of voters, what’s to stop them from running Moochelle?
6
posted on
11/30/2012 8:43:15 AM PST
by
Qwackertoo
(Going into Politic Free Zone Momma Grizzly hibernation for a while after this week, maybe forever.)
To: ClearCase_guy
What that would do is force him to commit his budget to paper.
He’s the supposed black president. He doesn’t have to anything he doesn’t want to do AND he gives out free obamaphones!
7
posted on
11/30/2012 8:44:55 AM PST
by
Bitsy
To: SeekAndFind
A Possible Republican Strategy for the Fiscal Cliff
Get Boehner Replaced!! Otherwise, the GOPe will just cave once again.
8
posted on
11/30/2012 8:45:02 AM PST
by
Eagle of Liberty
(Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
To: SeekAndFind
This ain't rocket science here. The ONLY item that the Dems care about here is the raising of the debt ceiling. The rest of the rhetoric is purely for show. If there is one issue that the Republicans must hold fast to, it is this:
DO NOT RAISE THE DEBT CEILING!
Let Obama have anything else he wants, only take away his ability to spend money he does not have.
9
posted on
11/30/2012 8:45:12 AM PST
by
Hoodat
("As for God, His way is perfect" - Psalm 18:30)
To: SeekAndFind
I like the Thelma and Loise approach to the “financial cliff”
Full speed ahead!
10
posted on
11/30/2012 8:47:09 AM PST
by
Tenacious 1
(The Click-&-Paste Media exists & works in Utopia, riding unicorns & sniffing pixy dust.)
To: Eagle of Liberty
Otherwise, the GOPe will just cave once again. You mean the GOP Spelunkers?
11
posted on
11/30/2012 8:48:03 AM PST
by
Tenacious 1
(The Click-&-Paste Media exists & works in Utopia, riding unicorns & sniffing pixy dust.)
12
posted on
11/30/2012 8:48:41 AM PST
by
RedMDer
(Please support Toys for Tots this CHRISTmas season.)
To: SeekAndFind
“President Obama is legally required to deliver a budget in January.”
He has never submitted one yet, so why would we expect a legal requirement to matter to him? He thinks that, to paraphrase Judge Dredd, he IS the law.
To: SeekAndFind; Thad Lost; jdsteel; GVnana; Kaslin; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; ..
RE :”
So my suggestion to them is to take a page from Obama’s playbook and kick the can one more time. They should extend the status quo for one more month, to February 1, 2013. The reason behind this strategy is that President Obama is legally required to deliver a budget in January. What that would do is force him to commit his budget to paper. He would be forced to blink.
....
Unrestrained by the need to run for re-election ever again, he has a totally free hand. His modus operandi is to “lead from behind”, but that won't work now. So if the Republicans extend the status quo until he has been forced to perform his presidential duties, they will force him to blink first. That will put the onus for what follows squarely upon his shoulders. All they have to do is say “Yes Sir, Mr. President, after you”. They can smile and be sweetly polite.
.....
If he acts, as he has been hinting, in campaign mode as he has done for the last four years, he will bear the legacy forevermore” I dont even understand what he is suggesting “Kick the can down the road” ???
What does that mean?? Give in to that set of demands he made yesterday for one month? Or just the tax cut extension?
The writer should be specific because rounding up votes right now will be tough to do..
I think his point is that the Reid Senate will reject Os budget getting the House off the hook. Interesting idea.
14
posted on
11/30/2012 8:56:03 AM PST
by
sickoflibs
(Has Bohner caved to Obama again yet?)
To: Qwackertoo
“whats to stop them from running Moochelle?”
Billary
To: SeekAndFind
The author is suggesting a way to win the political game, and it’s worth considering.
It doesn’t solve the bigger problem of overspending though. I hate it that the political theater has become a bigger concern than the future of the country.
16
posted on
11/30/2012 9:12:35 AM PST
by
kidd
To: sickoflibs; Kaslin; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3
” I think his point is that the Reid Senate will reject Os budget getting the House off the hook. Interesting idea. “
Sure as heck is.
To: Boogieman
He has never submitted one yet, so why would we expect a legal requirement to matter to him? He thinks that, to paraphrase Judge Dredd, he IS the law.That's not actually true. He has submitted budgets - the last one got voted down by 99 to 0 in the senate.
18
posted on
11/30/2012 9:16:20 AM PST
by
Sparticus
(Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
To: pepsi_junkie
"Honestly, it looks to me like the choice is tax hikes with fake spending cuts or tax hikes with actual spending cuts."
The Dems entire future is premised upon an out-of-control entitlement state where they get to dole out the goodies, and the Repubs are the meanies who want to take it away from you. We talk about the future of the country decades down the road, the country we will leave for our kids and grandkids, the value of hard work, etc... the Dems provide instant gratification. Instant gratification is winning big time.
Republicans will increasingly lose national elections and races in swing states I fear, no matter how enticing the candidate, as long as this exists. Anything that punctures this entitlement state is a desirable thing.
19
posted on
11/30/2012 9:20:25 AM PST
by
Qbert
("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
To: SeekAndFind
“O” Can’t make his state of the union speech until he is able to look good!
Being re elected ain’t enough!..since he has NO record of achievement.
I say, the economy is screwed no matter what Conservatives demand... so LET IT BLEED!
20
posted on
11/30/2012 9:21:34 AM PST
by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson