The usual RINO suspects but more conservatives than we’ve seen in a long time.
Morning all
Thanks for the thread and ping AB.
Looks like a potentially interesting bunch of lineups.
I assume we’re going to be treated to deep discussions of Obama’s deep involvement in the Bengazi murders and his upcoming impeachment.
< /sarc >
Present
Lurking only
(My last post on FR came out about half napalm, and none of you really need or deserve that...)
Good Morning All and thank you AB for your usual superlative Sunday morning thread.
Thanks for the ping but of a hectic few days as dad been in hospital after bad nose bleed and needed 2 units of blood. Thankfully back home again and am looking forward to the thread today.
Speaking of SOS, doesn't Hillary still have a private army of contractors in Iraq? I thought it was about 10,000 but being increased to 20,000 when Barry got out of Iraq. Couldn't any of those people have gotten to Benghazi while the shooting was still going on?
(There's a lesson to be learned here; if Barry Obama and his admin had ever watched a classic Western where the US Cavalry showed up just in time, maybe they would have thought of that. Too bad Barry's White House Choom gang thinks that Bareback Mountain is what Westerns look like.)
Morning AB, ALL
...no singing this morning, went to church yesterday, staying home today to enjoy yon company, quiet and presence with husband.
Did I tell y’all about my $42,000?
In due course. Meanwhile, thank you AB for doing this thread, as always, dependably and reliably.
I have been following Benghazi with concentration and , as expected, I’ve some thoughts.
And I don’t know just what’s going to come of it all.
I am, of course, way beyond “thinking” the administration lied about the riot thing, come on, I got common sense way beyond the Beltway crowd. It’s obvious Obama and Jarrett changed the whole narrative of the Benghazi events and if you want to talk to me about it do not even return to anything beyond that acknowledged lie.
For all week the various talking heads have been called upon to give their assessment of administration lies. Lessee, there’s been Jindal, Chuckie Schumer, Sherrod Brown, Joan Rivers, Micky Mouse .at one point they even asked Snookie of Jersey shore for her theory!
Some questions to ponder .did the administration just sit back and watch those people die?
Who are all those people evacuated from the annex, where are they, why don’t we get a translator, call them in, and find out what the hell happened? Some 40+ people evacuated from the CIA annex and no one’s talked yet to any of them?
What is Obama guilty of? At best, one might saythe administration is guilty of hapless performance.
At worst .what? Could this have been a planned event, could the “riot” have been arranged to allow a break in and removal of those prisoners for .oh I dunno, a nice big contribution through the Holy land charities to the Obama campaign?
Further, is this Benghazi thing impeachable? If so, will the congress do it? If not, why bother, why the hell bother?
In reference to my fabulous $42,000 that fell right from the sky into my lap, I happened to speak to a financial person Friday and she was way wise.
I chose to invest my sudden wealth in the stock market although I agonized for almost a week about it.
I did, of course, buy me some new clothes and gave my daughter some cause, hey, the money fell right outta the sky, more on this later.
Am interested in Benghazi theories as this always makes good Freep threads.
Next week may be Black Friday but sweets lovers across the nation hung their heads in sorrow on a dark Friday yesterday as Hostess announced they would cease making their line of products, which include the iconic Twinkies brand, because of the Bakers Union Strike.
FNS
[just turned it on]
Seems like Wallace is implying that the new talkingpoints/narrative is that the WH used ‘other stories’ [movie, etc.] so as not to tip off the terrorists.
==
FNS:
Saxby Chamblis talking about Petreaus testimony: Knew from day one it was a terrorist attack. References to Alkida and “attack” were removed by “somebody”
Susan Rice will have to come in and testify before the committee.
Lieberman: Whether or not it was a demonstration is interesting but not important. What is important is why the facility was left undefended.
FNS
If with the newest version of WH talkingpoints, Lieberman questions where and why regarding the security. Where was security and support and why was the Benghazi compound so unprotected?
Diane Feinstein defending the WH and Rice.
So ---- just who declassified the story that there had been a spontaneous demonstration???
Was that a classified lie until it was declassified and then became a declassified lie.
Wow....Feinstein is spinning in such circles, she makes no sense.
the CIA narrative was right, the only difference was one word, but the narrative was changed...HUH? We’re going to find out who made changes....says Feinstein, but there were no changes...HUH?
SHE IS SOOOOO NERVOUS!
she is brilliant that she says intelligence should be connected to policy and the security.DUH.
thank heavens we have a conservative on there ( Mike rogers?).
Now she has gone on and on about the long tours...Hey,
it’ s Obama.
FNS
Jindal clip: We gotta stop saying stupid things.
[Reference to Romney’s claim that he last because of all the Obama givaways.]
Jindal: We are not the party of big ...
Given that the Petraeus issue is still news, with more to come out, if this had been reveled BEFORE the election, Obama may very well have lost. Thanks for nothing, Gen P...
Goddamn, 39 minutes in at ABC, FINALLY George Will gets to raise Clinton name’s in connection with offices that require resignation for moral failings. OMG the hypocrisy from the Democrats on this. And wow did Raddatz change the subject post haste...
Martha Raddatz would do well to shut her trap every once in a while.