Skip to comments.Attack Widens on Clinton Staff Practices (Hillary fires WH Usher who called Barbara Bush in '96)
Posted on 11/17/2012 2:39:14 PM PST by Titus-Maximus
The Clinton Administration sent detailed questionnaires to longtime White House employees asking them about their finances and their personal and political activities, the Pennsylvania Congressman leading an inquiry into the White House's handling of personnel information said today. It is unclear how many employees received the questionnaires, which were sent to nonpolitical household staff as well as political appointees. But those who did receive them were instructed to return them to Craig Livingstone, who resigned as head of the White House personnel security office last week over his role in that office's improper acquisition of as many as 900confidential F.B.I. files, many of them on prominent Republicans. The 10-page questionnaire asked the employees to list anything they had ever written for publication; all their jobs since the age of 21; their party affiliations and those of their spouses, and all assets. The questionnaire also asked employees whether they had ever filed a late income tax return, and it asked them to list "each membership you have had with any civic, social, charitable, educational, professional, fraternal, benevolent or religious organization, private club or other membership organization during the last 10 years."
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Hillary is a witch! Let the press whitewash her and then we'll pour on the turpentine.
Um, I remember this, but it is relevant to today....how?
The NYT is just getting this out now so it’ll be “old news” when she runs in 2016.
You know that meter that Frank Luntz loves to show us, revealing real time opinions. If I were hooked up to that thing and the name Clinton or Obama was to come up, my favorable line would hit zero within 0.00001 second.
I remember all this stuff about the Clintons. Nothing could cause me to see them favorably. Same with Obama...
That’s not to say that I wouldn’t agree with something they might do by mistake. I know what their intent has been for decades, so I’m not going to be fooled.
Remember when the Clintons fired all the attorneys? And then Bush fired a few and the press went nuts trying to split hairs about how what Bush did was SO SO much worse than what the Clintons did.
The press ought to rot in hell - except they’d probably enjoy it there.
Because it is a clear demonstration of her deep character flaws and how she is unfit for the presidency.
Published: July 04, 1996
She’d be a witch-cat all right. Her policy would look a whole lot like Obama’s which in turn really is the motions given by his puppet masters, his unvetted-content teleprompter writers.
Why would we deny them that joy? That would be very black hearted of us.
Hillary would have been worse than Obama. She treats the “little people” around her with unspeakable rudeness and contempt. Deep, deep down she is a totally nasty person.
This is a precise example of Hillary’s interest in her own security and privacy, par excella’nce, as opposed to her utter disinterest in the personal security and the secure covert movement of an American ambassador.
Her State Dept staffers, as Charlene Lamb exhibits, appear in testimony to have no conscience, or are too dull to transmit repeated cries for increased security with any urgency. One with a conscience would resign.
Dude, the article's from 1996. Not sure why the poster thought it relevant today.
Yes, Hillary! is the she in shenanigans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.