[Marine_Uncle]

Thanks Brad for the post. Interesting things are coming out.
I'm going to hold my tongue until this info becomes a little better researched.

Pinging a few folks for their reference. Please do not feel obligated to respond. Of what weight it will bear, should it be shown to be factual, I'll let for us all to determine, as well as both sides of Congress.
BUT. IMHO. It's Bull Shit. Or the good general doen't have a a tenth of the brains I thought he might actually possess.

I cannot help but wonder how say General George S. Patton would have dealt with such a stupid statement.
I'll leave you all in peace. Brad. I'm signing off for the morning. Do have a great upcoming day.

Whoops! I guess I did not hold me tongue. :)

[no-to-illegals]

Please, never holdeth back thy tongue again. Thank You. You did good!

[BilLies]

In the article Rep King (R) states:
“The fact is, the reference to Al Qaeda was taken out somewhere along the line by someone outside the intelligence community,” Representative Peter T. King, a New York Republican, said after the House hearing. “We need to find out who did it and why.”
That does not support the headline or the demoCraps!

[TigersEye]

It's BS to say the least. There were sources in DC saying it was terrorists so it wasn't being kept a secret. Not to mention the president of Libya directly saying it was Answar al Sharia and naming them as a franchise of al Qaeda.

I saw some Dem saying that Petraeus told the committee that the CIA talking points was about the 'video.' The exact opposite of what everyone else was saying about Petraeus' testimony. This NYTs article is probably sourced from some Dem liar.

[onyx]

They’re all liars.

God bless and keep you.