To: Oldeconomybuyer
A U.S. intelligence official said the first video shows no sign the assault arose -- as first thought -- out of a demonstration. But it also indicates the attack, though intentional, was not well planned. So, does "not well planned" somehow make this something less than a TERRORIST attack? It only "counts" if it's deemed to be "well planned?!" Not sure who this "intelligence official" is, but they're not very smart for saying something so damn' stupid!
4 posted on
11/15/2012 5:14:21 PM PST by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: usconservative
For an attack that was not well planned, it certainly was successful.
Is this man saying that the US cannot repel a poorly planned attack, because that is apparently the case.
6 posted on
11/15/2012 5:17:05 PM PST by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: usconservative
But it also indicates the attack, though intentional, was not well planned.Well, there's obviously nothing to see here then, all is a okay.
10 posted on
11/15/2012 5:20:59 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
(Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
To: usconservative
I see it differently. It is a terrorist attack “not well planned” and we still didn’t have the support to stop it.
I see it as more damning evidence against the State Department.
28 posted on
11/15/2012 6:53:01 PM PST by
eyedigress
((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
To: usconservative
So, does "not well planned" somehow make this something less than a TERRORIST attack? It only "counts" if it's deemed to be "well planned?!" Not sure who this "intelligence official" is, but they're not very smart for saying something so damn' stupid!
BTTT
34 posted on
11/16/2012 5:58:20 AM PST by
Eagle of Liberty
(Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson