Another good article on why states should NOT establish their own exchanges, but make the Feds do it (btw, Feds have no funding to do it). Easy to understand, too:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/333040/obamacare-still-vulnerable-michael-f-cannon
I printed out that article. I am confused when I compare it to the Kaiser website map. Cannon of Natl Review states that AZ, GA, ID, IN, MT, OK, TN, UT have ‘enacted either statutes or constitutional amendments (or both) forbidding state employees to participate in an essential exchange function: implementing Obamacare’s ind. and employer mandates.
The site shows that the above states are either ‘studying options’ or have not done anything yet. So is one of these sources wrong or are there other aspects to this that I am missing?