Skip to comments.House members call for Benghazi answers, Petraeus testimony
Posted on 11/13/2012 3:50:12 PM PST by petitfour
Members of the House on Tuesday reiterated their call for the Obama administration to answer their questions about the September attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead, and pressed for former CIA Director David Petraeus to testify on the matter.
"Congress still doesn't know why our people in Libya were left vulnerable," Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) said on the House floor. "We still don't know why the U.S. military was not sent to their defense.
"It is of the highest importance that General Petraeus, who led the CIA at the time, be brought before Congress to testify as to what really happened in Benghazi, whether there was a security lapse or whether the administration temporized on security and stood down to mollify violent, disparate groups which have nothing in common with our nation," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Nixon was not impeached.
Sorry, I am not completely correct in saying he enhanced the ‘Great Society’, upon further checking I see where he did a lot to dismantle the giveaways LBJ started BUT he was probably the ‘father of Affirmative Action’ and he had other ‘problems’....
Ford, with his VN amnesty and Nixon pardon probably did more to hurt ‘us’ than anyone and we were probably ‘lucky’ that Carter came along and completely botched things up.
The birth of RINO’s probably can be attributed to the “Reagan Democrat” happening in the 80’s, then the onslaught started with a run of absolutley ‘poor’ Presidents...
Bush, Clinton (2), Bush (2), Obama (2) and I think ‘they’ will really have to outdo themselves to top this bunch..also have to throw the losers into this mix...... Dole, Gore, Kerry, McCain and Romney.
IF ‘THEY’ are out there, out spectacular Parties will find them....
The House should ask General Hamm at least these four questions:
1. Who (by name) ordered the rescue mission?
2. Who (by name) ordered him to stand-down?
3. Why did he disregard the stand-down order?
4. Who (by name) told his deputy to relieve him of command?
I think the answers may be:
(2) Jarrett [because she couldn't reach Obama in time to tell him to do it]
(3) General Hamm didn't believe he had to take orders from Jarrett
OMG....Pretty damn bad when the looney Democrat Dennis Kucinich has more balls than our guys!!
What is going on with the FR search function? It doesn’t work for me either.
Is it just me? Without a search function, FR is not all that valuable.
Wish I knew what was going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.