Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News source: Yes, the CIA was holding prisoners at the Benghazi annex
Hotair ^ | 11/12/2012 | AllahPundit

Posted on 11/12/2012 4:48:06 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Just a single source, but this does jibe with what Broadwell said in her Denver speech.

In the original Oct. 26 Fox News report, sources at the annex said that the CIA’s Global Response Staff had handed over three Libyan militia members to the Libyan authorities who came to rescue the 30 Americans in the early hours of Sept. 12.

A well-placed Washington source confirms to Fox News that there were Libyan militiamen being held at the CIA annex in Benghazi and that their presence was being looked at as a possible motive for the staged attack on the consulate and annex that night.

According to multiple intelligence sources who have served in Benghazi, there were more than just Libyan militia members who were held and interrogated by CIA contractors at the CIA annex in the days prior to the attack. Other prisoners from additional countries in Africa and the Middle East were brought to this location.

The Libya annex was the largest CIA station in North Africa, and two weeks prior to the attack, the CIA was preparing to shut it down. Most prisoners, according to British and American intelligence sources, had been moved two weeks earlier.

Two separate questions here. One: Is the CIA still operating secret prisons and, if so, how are they questioning their prisoners? Enhanced interrogation is the only part of the Bush counterterror playbook that O hasn’t adopted, or so we’ve assumed. We’ll see. Two: Did Ansar al-Sharia and its partners in jihad find out about the prisoners and attack the annex on 9/11 to try to free them? I’m thinking … probably not, for the reasons Ed gave this morning. If they thought there were prisoners at the annex, why’d they attack the consulate first and give up the advantage of surprise? The attack on the consulate wasn’t a diversion, either: According to the CIA’s timeline, the first attack at the annex didn’t happen until 11:56 p.m., more than two hours after the consulate attack had begun and after the CIA security team had already returned from the consulate to the annex. That makes it sound like the jihadis tailed the CIA’s people back to the annex; if they were planning an ambush to free prisoners, they should have had people pre-positioned there to move in as soon as they saw the CIA security team leave for the consulate earlier in the evening. And again, per Ed, if you were going to hold prisoners somewhere in the Middle East, why on earth would you choose a city as unstable as Benghazi?

Besides, the timeline of the Petraeus/Broadwell affair is hard to square with the idea of her being privy to secret info about Benghazi. Quote:

The affair between Gen. Petraeus and Broadwell, both of whom are married, began several months after his retirement from the army in August 2011 and ended four months ago, retired U.S. Army Col. Steve Boylan, who is a former Petraeus spokesperson, told ABC News…

Petraeus is said to have been the one to have broken off the extramarital affair.

If — if — all of that is accurate, then it sounds like Petraeus dumped Broadwell sometime in July and, given what we now know about those threatening e-mails that she sent to another woman, she probably didn’t take the news all that well. In which case, why would he still be sharing secrets with her two months later, after the Benghazi attack? Was Broadwell really revealing classified info in her Denver speech or was she just misremembering a report from earlier that day on Fox News? She did, reportedly, have classified documents on her computer, but both she and Petraeus claimed they didn’t come from him. And in fact, because of her background in the military, Broadwell allegedly had “a top secret/SCI clearance and then some.” She might have had access to info about Benghazi, and classified documents about whatever, from her contacts in the national security bureaucracy, entirely independent of Petraeus.

But maybe that timeline isn’t accurate. Petraeus’s allies might be keen to claim that the affair didn’t start until after he’d left the military because adultery is an infraction of the UCMJ. If the affair began while he was still in uniform, it’s not only a moral failing but potentially a legal issue.

Now, help me answer three questions. First, why did the FBI pursue its investigation of the cyber-harassment of Jill Kelley all the way back to Petraeus? My understanding from reading a bunch of stories this morning is that Kelley reported the harassment, the FBI quickly launched an investigation (no one’s sure why it was such a priority for them but maybe it has to do with Kelley’s JSOC connection), and they traced the harassing e-mails back to Broadwell. But they didn’t stop there; evidently they started digging around to see who was e-mailing Broadwell too, and they traced that back to a pseudonymous Gmail account operated by Petraeus. Er … why did they do that? Once they knew who the cyber-harasser was, why was it necessary to keep digging and piece out the entire love triangle? They’d found their suspect.

Second, why is Jill Kelley suddenly hiring some very expensive attorneys? Not only hasn’t she been accused of anything — not even an affair with Petraeus — but Petraeus and Broadwell aren’t being charged with any crimes either. Second look at what Broadwell’s father told the Daily News this morning?

Third, I have a post up in the Greenroom noting that Petraeus and Broadwell seemed conspicuously “together” as early as 2010, with even Mrs. Petraeus likely becoming aware of it before last Friday. John Brennan, Obama’s White House counterterror czar, allegedly learned of the affair in summer 2011 — before Petraeus was named the new CIA chief. That being so, how were Obama and James Clapper supposedly kept in the dark until last week? The One should be spitting mad that he wasn’t kept fully informed about potential liabilities of one of the most sensitive hires he’ll make as president. In theory, Petraeus could have been blackmailed or hacked or otherwise compromised, with catastrophic consequences for national security and O’s presidential legacy — and yet the FBI kept things hush-hush, even from their boss, until just a few days ago. Why? Here’s Scarborough and Peter King wondering. Key bit at 4:00.

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghaziannex; betrayus; cia; petreaus

1 posted on 11/12/2012 4:48:13 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Aha. And what info was the Ambassador trying to get out of them?


2 posted on 11/12/2012 4:51:08 PM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rendition, baby.... Obama-style!


3 posted on 11/12/2012 4:52:43 PM PST by Third Person (I'm in my prime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

Where our weapons were.


4 posted on 11/12/2012 4:54:19 PM PST by CodeToad (Padme: "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Prisoners but no extra security. None too bright of whomever chose to downgrade their security.


5 posted on 11/12/2012 4:59:01 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Since it was common knowledge of the affair, my guess is the FBI put this case together quickly. It probably didn’t garner much attention from other than middle management wienies. The biggies were to busy in election stuff. Holder was busy setting up Philly for the NBP. Then came an oh $hit moment. After the wild card whistle blower blabbed to Cantor the SHTF and became a political football.


6 posted on 11/12/2012 5:00:47 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

People claim the government lies... isn’t that unpossible?

lolz

sarcasm


7 posted on 11/12/2012 5:04:51 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would the militia attack the mission first, if their brothers in arms
Were being held at the annex? They only attacked the annex when
The seals came back from the mission. I don’t believe it. It’s just another
Excuse by Obama.


8 posted on 11/12/2012 5:06:37 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

So then Broadwell was correct in what she said. Maybe part of this was an attempt to shut her up???


10 posted on 11/12/2012 5:10:27 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Most prisoners, according to British and American intelligence sources, had been moved two weeks earlier.

If that is the case, I don't buy the proffered motive. Methinks this is "getting out" because gun running from Benghazi was starting to gain visibility.

11 posted on 11/12/2012 5:13:48 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party: advancing indenture since 1787.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Broadwell hiring Gloria Allred in 3.....2......1


12 posted on 11/12/2012 5:19:13 PM PST by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Water boarding. 0bama. Water boarding. 0bama. Water boarding. 0bama.


13 posted on 11/12/2012 5:53:55 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatasshick

I agree on all except #3. Guys dont care. :)


14 posted on 11/12/2012 5:56:25 PM PST by halfright (FAST & FURIOUS! DON'T ALLOW THEM TO DIVERT YOUR ATTENTION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I get the feeling that over the next few weeks the intelligence community is going to be leaking like a porcupine’s water bed.


15 posted on 11/12/2012 6:00:42 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

Romney had the perfect platform to break the Media silence on Benghazi during the third, “foreign policy”, debate. Yet, he let it go. He could have suppressed the Obama vote and moved people to his side of the aisle.


17 posted on 11/12/2012 6:10:48 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Apparently the bit about the detention center at The Farm are true, but I can’t buy the notion that the motives for the Consulate attack included the desire to free all detainees held there.

Spys are declared, or NOT declared, and the not declared guys neeeeever go to US government buildings because it would compromise their security —US govt buildings abroad are under heavy surveillance.

Obama’s cowardice you can count on, sure, but there are actually some really good tactical reasons for guys in charge at The Farm to have told the two SEALS to NOT rescue anyone at the Consulate, “If you guys get into kim chee up to your ears and have to scoot, then you’d bring all the attackers back here to The Farm, and then the US will get hit here, too, and not just back at the Consulate....those guys are history, so don’t go...”

I think The Farm got hit simply cuz the attackers followed the SEAL rescuers back to The Farm. Then, realizing that they’d come across a target of higher military value, they took 2 hours to scare up more attackers and weapons, and then they opened that attack also.

I think the Consulate attack was planned very well in advance and was executed mostly by amateurs, whereas the attack on The Farm had less planning but involved more serious weaponsAnd attackers.

The handing over of the 3 detainees —I wonder if that occured at the Consulate or The Farm...? And in either case, WHY..?


18 posted on 11/12/2012 6:21:32 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They hit the mission first because they wanted to grab the Ambassador to trade for prisoners. And no, it wasn’t Obama’s plan. The thugs did it. Where was the Ambassador after 8:30pm? We are told a lot of things. We see photos showing young men carrying him and we don’t know if he was dead or alive. I’ll be generous and say that he’s in the coffin that was buried, but what else do we know? Photos of him at the hospital? I think the thugs ran a “Snatch” raid to get the Ambassador. We traded two or three people for him. We got a dead Ambassador in exchange. So, we have Obama keeping prisoners in a foreign country after the Democrats screamed about Bush doing it AND Obama signs a law saying we won’t do it. They get caught without enough security at Benghazi. They lose some prisoners. They lose classified information. They lose four dead including a US Ambassador. They don’t send military rescue because they’re afraid a failure will ruin Obama’s chance for re-election(thereby writing off 40 Americans over a political decision). They trade for a dead Ambassador. The US gets run out of Benghazi with our tail tucked between our legs. And all this isn’t even the worst of it.


19 posted on 11/12/2012 6:35:28 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
I think the left will next try and have us believe that the Ambassador was killed while doing a Pants Off Dance Off with his Libyan friends and there was an accident.
20 posted on 11/12/2012 6:45:11 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

.

betrayed US

.


21 posted on 11/12/2012 6:54:46 PM PST by devolve ( ---- ---- ---- -CHEESEBURGER_CHEESEBURGER_CHEESEBURGER- ---- ---- ---- ---- John Belushi ---- ----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wow.. Obama violated his OWN Executive Order issued shortly after taking office. LOL!!!! IMPEACH OBAMA, NOW. Add one more impeachable offense to his list; War in Libya without consent of Congress. Overturning immigration law without consent of Congress. Making recess appointments while Congress not in recess. Cover-Up in Benghazi with 'a protest over a video' lie. Where's Susan Rice? Dereliction of Duty as Commander-In-Chief for abandoning four Americans to die in Benghazi.. Blah blah blah.. Numerous instances of withholding information prior to the election for his own political gain.. Blah blah blah.. If 0bama gets away with this one our ENTIRE CONGRESS is in on it with him. Time to SECEDE.

Glenn Beck predicted 2 or 3 weeks ago that Petraeus would be set up, discredited and booted out by Obama. This started the minute he was sent to Afghanistan to get him OUT OF THE WAY of our resident Marxists.

Glenn Beck's prediction here: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/beck-revisits-his-prediction-that-petraeus-would-take-fall-for-libya-this-is-what-the-mob-does-gang/

22 posted on 11/12/2012 7:03:38 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Let me get this straight... Our consolate was bombed in June, they asked for additional security, and instead they removed more security... so our consolate was pretty much defenseless... they beg and scream for security reinforcements, none comes....

And all the time they were holding prisoners???????

ARE YOU KIDDING ME???

It was bad enough they didn’t have security for an ambassador... but no security for prisoners???

Am I hearing this right?

How does this help Obama???


23 posted on 11/12/2012 7:03:57 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I recall seeing jail bars in video of the Embassy and we’re told this was a ‘safe room’. I remember thinking to myself ‘Self, why would a safe room have jail bars on it that the enemy could fire a weapon through?’ Wouldn’t a safe room be a solid steel door or a trap door to an underground hiding place? I DO remember seeing prison bars and I believe it might have been FoxNews special with Bret Baier. I’ve got it DVR’d.. Will have to check. THIS WOULD BE A HOLDING CELL OR JAIL, NOT A ‘SAFE ROOM’ AS WE WERE MISLEAD TO BELIEVE.


24 posted on 11/12/2012 7:14:30 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Right. And the attackers waited until the Turkish Diplomats left before they attempted to rescue their comrades. What incredible timing. Hey Fox, we need more, Karl Rove.


25 posted on 11/12/2012 7:17:43 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama will say he’s not responsible, because he didn’tknow. Thepress will believe him. The story will die.


26 posted on 11/12/2012 7:22:44 PM PST by cookcounty ("When I speak, I say what I mean and I mean what I say!" ---Joe Biden, 10/11/2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Was following your train of logic until you mentioned “(writing off 40 Americans)”. To what and who are you referring to there?


27 posted on 11/12/2012 7:25:00 PM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

The whole last two months I’ve thought it odd that Petraeus was completely silent and underground, other than the Sept 14th fiasco.


28 posted on 11/12/2012 7:31:23 PM PST by cookcounty ("When I speak, I say what I mean and I mean what I say!" ---Joe Biden, 10/11/2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
"It was bad enough they didn’t have security for an ambassador... but no security for prisoners???"

I believe no prisoners were hurt during the transfer of arms..

29 posted on 11/12/2012 8:01:11 PM PST by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, maybe these three prisoners were watching an Alec Baldwin movie and it caused an attack.


30 posted on 11/12/2012 8:35:22 PM PST by Terry Mross (No liberal who isn't prepared should be askin' me for help. DOOR SLAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
There were wood doors behind the bars leading into the "safe" room. You can see them in passing at 4:54 min and 15:07 in the Brett Baier Special Report.
31 posted on 11/12/2012 9:17:59 PM PST by cyn (Benghazi. That says it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
How does this help Obama???

This is all you need to know.

32 posted on 11/12/2012 9:20:42 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bump for later read


33 posted on 11/12/2012 9:24:24 PM PST by Wj33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

The day this happened, Glenn was saying it looked like a CIA operation. I remember the nutjobs at Gawker and HuffPo saying he was an idiot, and swore the agents were “civilians”. Now, who’s the idiot?


34 posted on 11/12/2012 9:52:00 PM PST by CPC24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

The Americans in Benghazi at the mission and the CIA Annex.


35 posted on 11/12/2012 10:11:18 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I bet they were waterboarding the prisoners.
36 posted on 11/13/2012 1:47:35 AM PST by eCSMaster (2012 elections: American Coup d'etat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It may be that U.S. personnel on the scene captured three attackers and turned them over to the friendlies when they showed up. Then the account got muddled and sinister as it went through the grapevine.


37 posted on 11/13/2012 2:09:15 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks SeekAndFind.
Is the CIA still operating secret prisons and, if so, how are they questioning their prisoners?
Administration Transparency Ping.


38 posted on 11/13/2012 3:23:51 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense

>>> I believe no prisoners were hurt during the transfer of arms..

lol... thats not what I meant. I’m sure the prisoners if there were any were liberated.

Whether your prison is covert or exposed, the mission of it’s security is two-fold... keep prisoners from escaping, and keep outsiders from liberating them.

To me, whether it was right or wrong to hold prisoners at the consolate, I find it totally stupid to do so without adequate security to prevent what was bound to happen.

Is Obama this stupid??? I don’t believe ANYONE can be this stupid... therefore I can only assume he WANTED it to happen.


39 posted on 11/13/2012 4:21:11 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

He could have suppressed the Obama vote and moved people to his side of the aisle....How? This is about sex, not treason. Nobody cares, except the humpin’.


40 posted on 11/13/2012 4:47:53 AM PST by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Prisoners but no extra security. None too bright of whomever chose to downgrade their security.

And yet people believe the government is organized enough to make 9/11/01 an inside job.

41 posted on 11/13/2012 9:06:03 AM PST by Repeat Offender (Official Romney/GOP-E Platform - We suck less)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

There is video.
Heinous s#!t.


42 posted on 11/13/2012 2:32:23 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

43 posted on 11/14/2012 8:08:26 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
There seemed to be an abundance of 'jail bars' in Stevens' embassy. They can be explained away as ingress security barriers but could've been holding cells..


44 posted on 11/14/2012 3:20:19 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

excellent


45 posted on 11/14/2012 11:00:49 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Donate, & walk precincts, not for "Parties", but for individual, principled "Candidates" (& for FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
"Our consolate was bombed in June, they asked for additional security, and instead they removed more security"

They were scheduled to rotate out, but Clinton could have extended their duty. She had plenty of discretionary funds to easily pay for them.

46 posted on 05/06/2013 3:19:16 PM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson