“Do you think Rush, Hannity, and the others in the conservative talk media will cover the blatant voter fraud in the swing states?”
Nope. They are part of the media elite. It’s not part of the narrative as Rush would say.
The problem isn’t fraud. The problem is overcoming identity politics.
With as much voter fraud that has apparently transpired,
I don’t see how secretaries of state are going to be able to certify their election results without violating the law.
I wonder at what point a secretary of state is willing to expose him/herself to the repercussions if the lid blows off.
You would think that the secretary of state in FL has got to be wondering if the secretary of state in Ohio is going to be able to keep a lid on things or not.
I wonder which one of them will buckle first?
If they ignore it I question their loyalty.
And the ‘Progressives’ believe that the millions of votes difference between 2008 and 2012 were due to ‘voter suppresion’!
Yes.
If no others, Beck (The Blaze and BlazeTV) will probably have the guts to cover this very important issue. There’s not much he will back down from.
Rush, levin, and hannity might well touch on the accusations of voter fraud, and say that things look weird, and that their “friends in the know” say there is evidence, and then they will change the subject. They have bosses, and also it will go nowhere. It could only backfire because Repubs in power have no b@lls. And it could only hurt Romney to talk about it.
Congress could order an investigation, and if congressional dems felt the pubs stole an election, they would not hesitate. We are the weakling, stuttering with glasses on, and the dems are always Biff.
There’s nothing stopping callers from bringing it up. Actually, those talkers are just a handful of people. We the people are responsible for raising a ruckus when there is blatant fraud in our government.
Why do you call them “conservative”?
A lot may depend on how the Allan West election turns out. It’s probably just the tip of the iceberg.
Even if they did, no one in Mordor would care.
Yes.
Rush has already said, “I don’t want to go there.”
They live the Marquess of Queensberry rules in an IED era.
Virginia was one of the closer votes and I can’t much evidence for fraud in my district or my county. What I did see was enormous turnout in the liberal city in my county, and in the black areas with at least 1/2 hour wait. In my own district turnout was relatively light, no wait. My county went 60/40 Romney which makes sense (20% black and liberal plus 20% basically stupid).
First, I believe the vote fraud was massive and may have turned the election.
Second, As soon as major figure runs with that opinion, without SIGNIFICANT PROOF, they will be dismissed as fringe.
I’ve got links to a dozen vote fraud stories that I consider very credible.
And the crap they’re pulling in Ft. St. Lucie is criminal.
But, unless someone is willing to put together an extensive video documentary, and defend endless lawsuits, it just won’t happen.
You’d have to have extensive cooperation from the various State AGs, and then put up with Holder defending and protecting the guilty.
I tend to think that Romney, affectionately known as “The Romster” (oh yeah, he was never affectionately known), is rather pleased not to take on this mess.
So, sift through the rubble all you want, he and his family are (wisely) done.
The problem is NOT Obama, but the 47% (and that, you can be sure is what it was) who voted for him.
We are stuck with THEM - Romney or no Romney, Rush or no rush, Guards or no Guards.
Sometimes, I think we're our own worst enemy.
They’ll talk about whatever they feel like talking about to fill their 3 hours a day. So what?
It’s not like what they say matters, they’re radio talk show entertainers and most of the people who listen to them have the same opinions already.
How about getting some of the people who don’t listen to talk radio to understand what is going on?