Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

Come on. Whatever the timing, you have the director of the CIA letting his illicit squeeze look at his sensitive e-mails ( among other sensitive things).
To me this is far less about the suspicious timing than it is the utter foolishness of a once-great soldier.


6 posted on 11/11/2012 4:17:21 AM PST by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LS

It’s all of the above. The GOP should have used this as a campaign issue even if they don’t use names.


7 posted on 11/11/2012 4:20:33 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS
you have the director of the CIA letting his illicit squeeze look at his sensitive e-mails

As I understand it the FBI concluded that there was no such security lapse.

People with very high security clearances get some on the side all the time. They are humans. When counter intelligence finds out they just make sure that said person isn't a CHICOM spy or some such. Otherwise it is no issue. Really! All people are humans.

And those on this forum who think that someone who agreed to put his life on the line for 30+ years and who agreed to go where he has to go 24/7 at the beck and call of the nation for 30+years (flag officers are probably paid on an hourly basis less than your car mechanic) agreed to be a monk just are plain out of their skull.

There are some things that are part of that social contract and some things that are not and when we confuse the two we are going to end up with third rate buttkissers running the military.

18 posted on 11/11/2012 5:44:25 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson