Posted on 11/10/2012 8:12:14 PM PST by Bratch
Bottom line, the consultants want a non-partisan candidate whom they can maneuver in whatever direction their endless polls and focus groups take them.
I hope those Judases enjoy their pieces of silver while they can.
Sickening that they’d bet against the country.
I guess the fact that Mitt was not the candidate that most conservatives wanted had noting to do with it.
well he could not be called Willard the Wise thats for sure...
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways..James 1:8
Palin is on my side. I am damn sick of paying a monthly check to a fat bitch wo breeds more fat bitches. I have worked in Atlanta and their whole life is to get your money. I was in a town where the whole black inhabitants were hanging out. I asked if it was a holiday. I got laughed at . Anyone that supports this welfare system is out of their mind. I will take you there. Drinking every day. They do not work. Ever. They breed.
remember, there was unquestionable fraud...in many areas...even Colorado...
so where do we begin criticizing when we don't even know if Romney actually lost?....
solve that question, they we can critique,,,
This is a good question, and it's not a rhetorical one, either. It's not terribly relevant in this case because in a political campaign, the candidate is not the business manager.
Having said that, I just had a wild thought that the GOP missed a golden opportunity to put together a game plan for 2012 that would have been unstoppable: Nominate a "movement conservative" (I'll use Sarah Palin as an example only because the author uses her in this piece) to go up against Obama, and have Romney manage the financial and organizational aspects of the campaign while the "professionals" run the political side of things.
Just a wild thought here ...
I gave him money and supported him too. And these allegations infuriate me because I find the idea of him surrounded by backstabbers while people like us are working hard to save our country disgusting.
I believe there was fraud committed, but at the same time Romney seemed to have had his campaign full of consultants who were victims of groupthink and not fully in it to win it.
I too have been thinking but not wanting to believe this, hoping against hope it wasn't true.
The LOVE of money (not the money itself) is the root of all evil. (and you can look that up!)
Wealthy people don't like to contribute to grassroots campaigns without a political consultant in control so the candidate won't lose control and the peons be havin big parties and barbeeques with their contributions.
They generally don't trust righteous conservative candidates or populist candidates unless a political pro has a short leash on the campaign treasurer.
They're also afraid of being turned on by the conservative candidate after elected should righteous principles in public policy become involved if you know what I mean!!!
The smarter and richer one is, the more challenging and easier to fool they are as a "mark!"
They've become so successful and powerful and over confident that these types can be had easier that some on the lower end of the spectrum that still use common sense (like righteous conservatives who more uncertain and lean on a higher power)!!!
I agree with Rush that Romney is a good human being and would never deliberately hurt a fly. Sometimes, as another good man like Reagan proved, you had to be more assertive and although trying to trust... You had to verify!!!
Explains it all, good work
Who could have beaten this juggernaut - this amalgam of racists, liars, media, illegals, takers, idiots, and on and on and on?
If you confront them you’re demonized as mean, if you play nice you’re portrayed as weak, if you state the hard cold facts the media ignores you, if you make the case for jobs the lazy takers are outraged, if you expect women to behave like adult women and not mindless greedy miscreants whose only concern is their vaginas then you are against women.
When you’ve got the media you’ve got everything.
Anybody can be a Monday Morning Quarterback...
Besides, since he lost on Tuesday and this is Saturday and all the Monday morning quarterbacks will be on TV on Sunday morning... You can't possible mean that I'm one of those, right??? (grin)
I voted for Romney. I’m not trolling here; but if all this is true about Romney’s team, while Obama’s team effectively got out the vote, can there be any other conclusion than the Dems seem a whole lot smarter than the Reps?
BTW if all the charges of fraud are also true, it appears the Dems outsmarted the pure-as-the-driven-snow, child-like Republicans in fraud as well.
Yep — Mitt got conned as he was conning us —
Reagan didn’t need no stinking consultants.
He's probably still shaking his head trying to figure out what happened to him mumbling things like "but Rove said ..." and "ORCA ... what happened to ORCA???" -- as he writes another check.
Reminds me of Saddam’s “Yes Men” in Baghdad on the eve of the American Invasion on March 17, 2003.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.