Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Director Petraeus resigns over extramarital affair with biographer
NY Post ^ | November 10, 2012 | CARL CAMPANILE

Posted on 11/10/2012 6:04:06 AM PST by COUNTrecount

Cia Director David Petraeus’ career came crashing down like a cheap spy novel yesterday when he resigned over an extramarital, wartime affair with a woman who wrote a flattering biography about the retired four-star general.

The bombshell — revealed after Petraeus resigned his post — stunned the political, military and intelligence establishments with reports of steamy e-mails between the two, including a reference to sex under a desk.

Petraeus’ lover was identified as Paula Broadwell, 40 — the co-author of a fawning biography, “All In: The Reuters

“After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair,” Petraeus said in a letter to CIA colleagues yesterday.

“Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours. This afternoon, the president graciously accepted my resignation.”

The relationship dated to Petraeus’ days commanding troops in Afghanistan in 2010 and 2011. The affair prompted an FBI investigation over fears that Broadwell had accessed the general’s e-mail, possibly gaining access to classified information.

But another FBI source told Newsmax that the FBI had been intercepting Petraeus’ e-mails since last spring after it mistook one exchange with his girlfriend as a reference to corruption.

His position as CIA director allowed him top security clearance, and since he’s married, the FBI continued to monitor the exchanges.

One e-mail included graphic references about having sex under a desk, the Newsmax report said.

As head of the CIA, philandering is considered a breach of security that could compromise national security by opening him up to blackmail.

The affair itself could be considered grounds for a court-martial.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: broadwell; petraeus; petraeusemails
Broadwell broke off the affair with the 60-year-old Petraeus after he was sworn in as CIA director on Sept. 6, 2011, but he continued to pursue her with numerous e-mails, the Newsmax report said.

Broadwell — who is a reserve army officer in addition to being a writer — describes herself as a national security analyst who resides in Charlotte, NC. She is married to Scott Broadwell, a radiologist, and they have two children. Like Petraeus, she’s a West Point graduate.

Her LinkedIn bio says she served a three-year stint as a liaison officer with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force from 2003 to 2006

1 posted on 11/10/2012 6:04:13 AM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

How stupidly even the wise behave.


2 posted on 11/10/2012 6:10:50 AM PST by kenavi (Lost the country? Win your state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

libyagate....obama murder...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgJHiVHLn8c


3 posted on 11/10/2012 6:11:07 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

There’s always room under zero’s bus.


4 posted on 11/10/2012 6:12:33 AM PST by duckman (I'm part of the group pulling the wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I am sure she was crawling under his desk to pass an obstacle course.

Email is no way to pursue an illicit relationship.


5 posted on 11/10/2012 6:12:52 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Obama (via the Democratic machine) probably knew of this affair before appointing Petraeus as Director of the CIA and held this in his back pocket until he needed some leverage.

Now, if Petraeus sings about Benghazi, he may be court martialed. If court martialed, I wonder if he would lose his pension?

6 posted on 11/10/2012 6:13:41 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

That would be Obama’s style


7 posted on 11/10/2012 6:16:21 AM PST by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount; kenavi

No, he wasn’t wise. He was, and is, a self-promoter who took credit for good things and got out of town fast when things started to look bad. The Iraq surge success was phony.

He resigned because the FBI was investigating his honey for having access to the general’s emails that may have contained classified information.. partly. The real reason he resigned is because he was complicit in what happened at Benghazi.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/26/Petraeus-on-Benghazi-It-Wasnt-Me


8 posted on 11/10/2012 6:17:33 AM PST by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

So, she’s a “Reserve Army Officer”. Interesting. Let’s see if they go after her.

I would guess that the FBI would have interviewed some people who were with Petraeus in Afghanistan and that at least one of them would have notified Petraeus that he was being investigated. Yesterday, it was printed that the FBI had notified the White House of this before the election.


9 posted on 11/10/2012 6:18:52 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Sad, but just a thought out of the box...if P were to testify as a member of Obama's administration he would probably be bound by O's version of what happened. It did seem strange that he came out so strongly in support of the "vicious, slandering" video reason for the invisible mob attack. Perhaps he was under pressure Obama to support or have the affair info leaked.

As a civilian testifying before congress he is no longer restrained from telling the whole truth. It is a testimony I await from someone I still believe is an honorable man.

Only time will tell. This disgrace has a long story yet to be told.

10 posted on 11/10/2012 6:19:16 AM PST by ibytoohi (What the hell has happened to my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eccentric
What is strange is that he now feels it is wrong for the Director of CIA to have had an affair (previous to becoming Dir of CIA), but he didn't feel it was wrong when he accepted the appointment as Dir of CIA.
11 posted on 11/10/2012 6:20:48 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

“Steamy emails” sent by the Director of the CIA - We truly are led by stupid people. Corrupt, dishonest liars are one thing, but being really stupid and being in such a critical job to our nation’s security is just unbelievable. And so many of us were under the impression he was one of our best.


12 posted on 11/10/2012 6:22:12 AM PST by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reddon
Photobucket
13 posted on 11/10/2012 6:24:12 AM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

From what I’ve read, she is/was a MAJ in the USAR. She was formerly an active duty CPT, a veteran, and in intel.


14 posted on 11/10/2012 6:26:01 AM PST by CheneyChick (01/20/2013 -- the day that could have been)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ibytoohi
I have feared that Petraeus was an opportunist but good at his job. I was so hoping that there will be SOMEONE with a conscience that will come forward and expose the criminality of this Admin. I don't know if it will be Petraeus. I do believe there are still some good Dems. We just need one to have a conscience attack so the American people can find out the truth under all the lies.
15 posted on 11/10/2012 6:27:56 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Had Petraeus not been associated with Bush and Republicans, he would be judged by Democratic standards and still be CIA director.


16 posted on 11/10/2012 6:29:19 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

He’s not the first man in a position of power to get caught by thinking with the wrong head! History repeats itself.


17 posted on 11/10/2012 6:31:41 AM PST by ibytoohi (What the hell has happened to my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
So he's responsible for sex while Obama's reponsible

for death and who am I supposed to be mad at again??
18 posted on 11/10/2012 6:39:59 AM PST by trailz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
If court martialed, I wonder if he would lose his pension?

No -- because his wife is the daughter of a 4 star General.

19 posted on 11/10/2012 6:42:08 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Is anyone else surprised by the fact that the FBI can monitor all e-mails of the Director of the CIA? This means that Holder is potentially monitoring the e-mails of every high official in government, including the Secretary of State and President himself.

Are there FBI agents who have a higher security clearance than the Director of the CIA and can read his e-mail? Amazing!

20 posted on 11/10/2012 6:42:37 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

She was a thorough biographer. She was able to write the final chapter on his career while he was still alive.


21 posted on 11/10/2012 6:43:25 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Cynical about the political process. Who, me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

The FBI was monitoring his emails written when he was still on active duty.


22 posted on 11/10/2012 6:44:52 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

If Petraeus truly loved this country, he would have come out in October and told the nation what really happened. Howvever, as with all of the top brass in Washington, he cared more about his self-interests than about the nation.


23 posted on 11/10/2012 6:45:06 AM PST by Raster Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

And her book will now become a best seller.


24 posted on 11/10/2012 6:47:57 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

I read somewheres that the FBI first stumbled onto the affair when Broadwell tried to access Petraeus’ confidential emails..if so, that’s a totally different story..


25 posted on 11/10/2012 6:53:48 AM PST by ken5050 ("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three or more are a Congress".. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

Who monitors Holder’s email? Is he above scrutiny?

I believe that Petraeus’ affair was known when he was offered the position. It was held until mecessary. The General was going to testify next week and he would tell the truth. That story would differ from the Whitehouse version. Therefore, he must be painted as an unscrupulous cheat; an adulterer who cannot be believed about anything.

He had alrerady made the statement that the CIA did not give the orders to stand down, and pointed the finger at the WH. He was, and is, a threat to this administration.

If he does testify, and he should, look for it to be denied completely. I think he is an honorable man who made a mistake. He gave most of his life to this country and I thank him for his service. He used bad judgement and God will forgive him if he is repentant. I hope that his family will be strong enough to get through this.

CIC Bill Clinton carried on an affair IN the WH and it was no big deal....nothing to be upset about, they said. More evidence of the double standard here.


26 posted on 11/10/2012 7:17:12 AM PST by jch10 (BO went to bed and let Americans die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

If he had just agreed to end it when she wanted to, this may never have come out. Now, his foolishness has destroyed both their careers & families.
No fool like an old fool


27 posted on 11/10/2012 7:18:48 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ibytoohi
He’s not the first man in a position of power to get caught by thinking with the wrong head! History repeats itself.

It's just amazing how there is so much garbage out there about Soetoro that the FBI just doesn't seem to be able to find.

28 posted on 11/10/2012 7:20:36 AM PST by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
You wrote: "The FBI was monitoring his emails written when he was still on active duty."

That does not appear to be correct. According to the NYTimes:

Government officials said that the F.B.I. began an investigation into a “potential criminal matter” several months ago that was not focused on Mr. Petraeus. In the course of their inquiry into whether a computer used by Mr. Petraeus had been compromised, agents discovered evidence of the relationship as well as other security concerns. About two weeks ago, F.B.I. agents met with Mr. Petraeus to discuss the investigation.

Petraeus resigned from the Army on August 31, 2011.

So this means he the affair, resigned from the Army to take the CIA position, knowing he had had a recent affair. Then "someone" notified the FBI to start looking at his e-mails "several months ago". Several months ago like September 12, 2012. Get the drift?

Finally, this gem from the AP

Morell rather than Petraeus now is expected to testify at closed congressional briefings next week on the assault on the consulate in Benghazi, which occurred on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

29 posted on 11/10/2012 7:30:46 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kenavi

Maybe the fact that he was not the only general having affairs in Afganistan can explain some of the “strange” ways this war has gone. Maybe the relations with the government - which many have called corrupt - did not take cleaning out their house when they saw corruption in the higest ranking officers. (this may also point to the the similar issues of SPENDING in congress - the millions that did not vote see corrution and no solution...pass it along - it must stop.)


30 posted on 11/10/2012 7:36:32 AM PST by q_an_a (the more laws the less justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Anyone believing this was the real reason, raise your hands. Anyone? Anyone?

Interesting timing.

31 posted on 11/10/2012 7:39:20 AM PST by bgill (We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

I might be wrong, but I had the impression that the emails were written when he was still on active duty but the investigation was recent.


32 posted on 11/10/2012 7:39:49 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Yes, it’s possible both items are correct. The e-mails were written while Petraeus was on active duty but the investigation began after he was with the CIA.


33 posted on 11/10/2012 7:44:31 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
Actually, I also recall hearing that she broke off the relation as he was about to leave the army and then he followed-up by continuing to send a flurry of emails after the break-up.

So he may have already started at CIA when these emails continued. This would be the source of the statement that the FBI was concerned that she had access to his CIA email account.

34 posted on 11/10/2012 7:46:37 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux; BigBobber; COUNTrecount

Check out this letter to the editor of the NYT earlier this year. (July 13, 2012)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/magazine/a-message-from-beyond.html?_r=0

MY WIFE’S LOVER

“My wife is having an affair with a government executive. His role is to manage a project whose progress is seen worldwide as a demonstration of American leadership. (This might seem hyperbolic, but it is not an exaggeration.) I have met with him on several occasions, and he has been gracious. (I doubt if he is aware of my knowledge.) I have watched the affair intensify over the last year, and I have also benefited from his generosity. He is engaged in work that I am passionate about and is absolutely the right person for the job. I strongly feel that exposing the affair will create a major distraction that would adversely impact the success of an important effort. My issue: Should I acknowledge this affair and finally force closure? Should I suffer in silence for the next year or two for a project I feel must succeed? Should I be “true to my heart” and walk away from the entire miserable situation and put the episode behind me?” NAME WITHHELD

Don’t expose the affair in any high-profile way. It would be different if this man’s project was promoting some (contextually hypocritical) family-values platform, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. The only motive for exposing the relationship would be to humiliate him and your wife, and that’s never a good reason for doing anything. This is between you and your spouse. You should tell her you want to separate, just as you would if she were sleeping with the mailman. The idea of “suffering in silence” for the good of the project is illogical. How would the quiet divorce of this man’s mistress hurt an international leadership initiative? He’d probably be relieved.

The fact that you’re willing to accept your wife’s infidelity for some greater political good is beyond honorable. In fact, it’s so over-the-top honorable that I’m not sure I believe your motives are real. Part of me wonders why you’re even posing this question, particularly in a column that is printed in The New York Times.

Your dilemma is intriguing, but I don’t see how it’s ambiguous. Your wife is having an affair with a person you happen to respect. Why would that last detail change the way you respond to her cheating? Do you admire this man so much that you haven’t asked your wife why she keeps having sex with him? I halfway suspect you’re writing this letter because you want specific people to read this column and deduce who is involved and what’s really going on behind closed doors (without actually addressing the conflict in person). That’s not ethical, either.


35 posted on 11/10/2012 8:02:38 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

That’s wild.


36 posted on 11/10/2012 8:06:13 AM PST by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

Isn’t it? I sure hope he blows every whistle that he’s got, now that he has been fully burned.

And he should stay away from Fort Marcy Park, avoid solo boating trips, etc.


37 posted on 11/10/2012 8:09:37 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

OMG - so the NYTimes knew.


38 posted on 11/10/2012 8:31:31 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

She was able to write the final chapter on his career while he was still alive.


Unlike the rest of us, he is going over the “physical” cliff.


39 posted on 11/10/2012 8:43:10 AM PST by AFret. ("Charlie don't surf ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
To me this is the bigger story, that being the FBI investigating the e-mails of the CIA director, not the affair. The people in power are so naive it is unbelievable. They really don't think government eyes aren't on them?

Just like Bill Clinton doing things with Monica in the Oval Office, the OVAL OFFICE! If there is ANY spot on the entire earth that our government or any number of foreign governments would want bugged it would be the Oval Office, duh.

40 posted on 11/10/2012 9:21:01 AM PST by Guardian Sebastian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Let us see what Dr Broadwell will do. In North Carolina the husband can sue his wife’s boyfriend. There have been some real high dollar judgments in this state. I would love to see the general taken to the cleaners.


41 posted on 11/10/2012 11:54:45 AM PST by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson