Posted on 11/08/2012 6:02:26 PM PST by Typical_Whitey
I had hoped that the majority of voters would elect Mitt Romney, but instead of a man of character they chose charisma. They ignored four years of failure and deception. In advertising, they say “Sell the sizzle, not the steak.” Romney, sadly, lacked sizzle.
Obama’s victory was one of a long line of Progressives from Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter. It was not new, but it will likely do more damage on top of what his predecessors have done. It turned out that there were not enough voters from the faith-based communities. You know—the kind of people Obama said “cling to their religion and guns.” There were not enough from a range of population subsets to make a difference.
Like New York’s Mayor Michael Bloomberg who thought a marathon run through boroughs devastated by Hurricane Sandy was a really good idea, Obama has never had any real sense of how people feel about things that are important to them. Why should he?
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
If we are nuked in 2016 by an outraged, 80% christian russia ( by means of a coup from the anti muslim conservatives) which is losing its country to islam, don't be surprised. The USA is the largest supplier of weaponry and cash to the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda and every grass roots islamic organization on earth. We are giving away our nukes while russia keeps theirs. Go Figure.
Moscow is submerged in moslems. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BYExXqM7k4
Well...
...there ARE those un derground bunkers in D.C.
Interest-rate ping.
This is this term’s crisis. They have to keep crashiing the system in order to replace it with the new world socialist nationalism.
Got it. Thanks.
You’re welcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.