Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax hike for wealthy Americans won't kill growth:CBO
Reuters ^ | Nov 8, 2012 | David Lawder and Kim Dixon

Posted on 11/08/2012 4:15:39 PM PST by mdittmar

(Reuters) - Allowing income tax rates to rise for wealthy Americans, and maintaining rates for the less affluent, would not hurt U.S. economic growth much in 2013, the Congressional Budget Office said on Thursday, stepping into a dispute between Republicans and Democrats over how to resolve the so-called "fiscal cliff."

The report by the authoritative non-partisan arm of Congress is expected to fuel President Barack Obama's demand for higher taxes on the rich, part of his proposal to avoid the full impact of the expiring tax cuts and across-the-board spending reductions set to begin in early 2013 unless Congress acts.

Republicans argue that any tax increases would be devastating to the economy, particularly to small businesses, and to U.S. employment rates.

They have held firm to their position that none of the cuts, which originated during the administration of President George W. Bush, should be allowed to expire.

The CBO said the tax hikes for the wealthy would reduce job growth by around 200,000 jobs, much less than the 700,000 in job losses claimed by Republican Speaker of the House John A. Boehner.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: mdittmar

The cbo has absolutley no credibility with the American people. The economy is passing up their lies... on its way to hell.

LLS


21 posted on 11/08/2012 4:32:26 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (I AM JOHN GALT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
"CBO said the tax hikes for the wealthy would reduce job growth by around 200,000 jobs, much less than the 700,000 in job losses claimed by Republican Speaker of the House John A. Boehner."

It's bad, but not as bad as we thought.

How can you kill something that's already dead?

22 posted on 11/08/2012 4:32:59 PM PST by Paladin2 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The CBO propaganda memo not playing too well with the John Galt Society. Jobs are dropping off like the stock market.


23 posted on 11/08/2012 4:32:59 PM PST by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Those 47% don’t care about tax increases, where have I heard that before?


24 posted on 11/08/2012 4:33:53 PM PST by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Boehner should just have a press conference and say Obama believes that tax increases will help this country. So we are reluctantly going along. Say it so it can be a republican campaign commercial in 2014 and the media cannot change it.

John Roberts could not have said it better. Bohner now is negotiating with himself. Obama needs to do nothing.

25 posted on 11/08/2012 4:34:07 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

That’s the problem with trying to model human economic behavior based on history.


26 posted on 11/08/2012 4:34:41 PM PST by Paladin2 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
would not hurt U.S. economic growth much in 2013 because there isn't going to be any growth to hurt.
27 posted on 11/08/2012 4:36:13 PM PST by Son House (Romney Plan: Cap Spending At 20 Percent Of GDP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
"John Roberts could not have said it better."

That was my thought earlier to-nite: John Boner, the Traitor Roberts of the House.

28 posted on 11/08/2012 4:36:30 PM PST by Paladin2 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

IIRC the CBO only processes the numbers it is given by whomever requested the calculations. If the numbers are provided by Dhims then it’s all rainbows and skittles. If by RINOs then either rainbows or skittles, not both.


29 posted on 11/08/2012 4:40:51 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

I think another operative word is 2013. I suspect a lot of taxpayers won’t see the real impact until they file their 2013 taxes in April 2014 and find themselves writing a big check to Uncle Sam because too little was withheld in 2013. In 2014 we will see those taxpayers assessing the real cost and doing tax planning to the extent possible. Whatever slowdown happens in 2013 is likely to pale compared to 2014 defensive tax planning.


30 posted on 11/08/2012 4:41:14 PM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

You know....Intrade should do these projections /sarc. or not


31 posted on 11/08/2012 4:48:08 PM PST by libertarian27 (Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Yep. I’m going to do my part to spend as little money into the economy as possible. ESPECIALLY in the case of left-leaning businesses.


32 posted on 11/08/2012 4:51:43 PM PST by tickedoffnow (No more...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I wonder if Vegas will make Odds on this?? Who are the nimrods running CBO?? Couldn’t find tag from The Onion anywhere in story??


33 posted on 11/08/2012 4:56:03 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Hmm... Well it sure won’t help the national debt either no will it.


34 posted on 11/08/2012 4:58:33 PM PST by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
It is so simple! The lafer curve has been correct 100% to the time, even as you look back 2500 years. basically it says when government takes more than 18% of GNP then economy starts to shrink and tax revenues also decline causing debt to increase.

It is because government first becomes inefficient, then incompetent, then corrupt. We have reached the corrupt stage.

35 posted on 11/08/2012 5:03:43 PM PST by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
Thier sites are on the “middleclass” me and you to pay.

What's scary is, it wouldn't take much to nudge me and my family over the poverty line. I suppose I better get in line for those "bennies."

Maybe I should become a cage fighter....

Sorry, just being random.
36 posted on 11/08/2012 5:06:06 PM PST by Thorliveshere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Sure, sure. A modest increase in tax rates for the wealthy won’t really hurt anybody. It also won’t solve the problem, even slightly.

A massive increase in taxes on the middle class and upward in income would be necessary to make any real progress in deficit reduction, but would also kill jobs and send us into another recession, defeating the entire purpose.

Then deficits would skyrocket, as nanny state entitlements would necessarily skyrocket, but tax revenue would crash, creating greater and greater debt, at an even faster rate than before.

And does anyone think that any real budget cuts, or even a reduction in the rate of increase in social spending will be agreed to by Obama and Reid? Of course not. We are heading over the cliff to Recessionville in short order.


37 posted on 11/08/2012 5:09:33 PM PST by Richard Axtell (put your money into canned food and shotguns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

You hit it on the head. Those “200,000 jobs” are done by people, not bean-counter numbers.

Watch the rich take their money offshore and stop making investments in the US.

Yeah, that’s the way to help the American economy, Obama. Drive out the money that creates jobs while you print worthless Weimar Republic trillion-dollar notes.

You sure are a man of the people, just not our people. Red China loves you, as does Putin. Way to go, Comrade!


38 posted on 11/08/2012 5:09:46 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

LOL! Okay, we will see.


39 posted on 11/08/2012 5:15:01 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
If Boehner is going to agree to raise taxes on the rich, then he needs to make sure it's on people who make enough to be able to afford to get out, and by enough to insure that they do it.

They'll be back when things settle down.....

40 posted on 11/08/2012 5:15:07 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson