[GeronL]

I think conservatives are not going to nominate a RINO again.

“They’re electable” is not going to cut it

[muawiyah]

The guy we ran this time wasn't really a Republican and he didn't really win the primary votes.

If we can dump the 15% who are GOP-e voters, and their masters, we won't ever have to talk about Christie again.

[Zhang Fei]

I think conservatives are not going to nominate a RINO again. “They’re electable” is not going to cut it

Not all Republicans are conservatives. That's how Romney became the nominee. But most Republicans, even non-conservatives, understand the need to not undermine your guy in the midst of an election. Christie will be lucky to win re-election in 2013 - he won by less than 4% in 2009. Imagine if Republicans stay home to protest his destruction of Romney's campaign. There's no way he wins the nomination in 2016. I can't imagine that the Super PAC donors who shelled out hundreds of millions on Romney only to be torpedoed by Christie as going to look kindly on a Christie run.

[mrsmel]

I hope we mean it this time. We, including myself, buckled on Romney. No more. I can assure myself of that by not voting at all anymore, and that’s my intention. Next week I go to unregister.

[Fiji Hill]

I think conservatives are not going to nominate a RINO again.

“They’re electable” is not going to cut it

I think they are. With a couple of exceptions, they've nominated a RINO in every presidential election year since 1928.

[Road Glide]

“I think conservatives are not going to nominate a RINO again.
“They’re electable” is not going to cut it”

Ha, ha, ha, ha.

Fearless prediction:
The NEXT Republican candidate will probably be the left of Romney.

Got to entice the Latinos, Asians, and “ladyparts voters” to our side, right?

(BTW: I claim credit for the new term, “ladyparts voter”, which we can expect to see used much in the future...)