To: fifedom
The original article makes it clear that Romney did well among evangelicals who actually did vote. Really? With a question like this "Could it have been that many evangelicals couldn’t bring themselves to vote for a Mormon, and simply stayed home?" it looked like another "Blame Christians First" article.
Is your post # 1 part of the article? Naturally I didn't click the link. And since you posted such a short incomplete excerpt, I figured there wasn't anything to read anyway.
20 posted on
11/08/2012 12:29:45 PM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Is your post # 1 part of the article?
Yes the first post is the article.
You can call it bashing evangelicals but the question remains why is the vote total lower? I do to think it is bashing anyone to ask the question whether it was due to lower turnout among a group. If they did not turn out and they did vote in previous elections, then what is the reason?
It may be as you have stated that Romney was too liberal for them, but do you think Romney is more liberal than McCain?
23 posted on
11/08/2012 12:38:42 PM PST by
fifedom
To: Responsibility2nd
With a question like this "Could it have been that many evangelicals couldnt bring themselves to vote for a Mormon, and simply stayed home?" it looked like another "Blame Christians First" article. Christians got fed to the lions in Nero's day and it looks like nothing has changed in 2,000 years.
Only now they call it *throwing them under the bus*.
41 posted on
11/08/2012 2:05:57 PM PST by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson