[fifedom]

Is your post # 1 part of the article?

Yes the first post is the article.

You can call it bashing evangelicals but the question remains why is the vote total lower? I do to think it is bashing anyone to ask the question whether it was due to lower turnout among a group. If they did not turn out and they did vote in previous elections, then what is the reason?

It may be as you have stated that Romney was too liberal for them, but do you think Romney is more liberal than McCain?

[Responsibility2nd]

Is Romney more liberal than McCain? That is a darn good question. I’m late for an appointment, but when I get a chance, I’ll put some thought into that and get back to you.

[Holly_P]

Is your post # 1 part of the article?

Yes the first post is the article.

If it's an "excerpt only" source, it's against F.R. posting rules to post the entire article in a reply, you're flirting with an infringement law suit against F.R. to do so.

If it's not an "excerpt only" source, why not post the entire article where it belongs?

[daniel1212]

When you attack the most conservative group in America because turnout numbers were somewhat down in voting for a quasi conservative, while 80% of them voted for Romney yet only approx. 50% of Catholics voted likewise, then it seems like someone is trying to divert attention away from another religious group.

What would have happened if the other groups voted like evangelicals, or is that a question that is to be avoided?