Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forecast: Mitt Romney Will Likely Win Ohio
Disreport ^

Posted on 11/06/2012 9:29:15 AM PST by Arthurio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2012 9:29:17 AM PST by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Duh


2 posted on 11/06/2012 9:34:42 AM PST by scooby321 (AMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

I predict Ohio turnout will be 6 million. I said that yesterday. 1.8 million total early voters is about 30% of total turnout.

That’s my prediction.

8 million registered voters I believe for a 75% turnout of registered voters - outstanding.


3 posted on 11/06/2012 9:34:56 AM PST by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

for later


4 posted on 11/06/2012 9:34:56 AM PST by Doctor 2Brains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Likely? Wow, strong language. /s


5 posted on 11/06/2012 9:35:23 AM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Best news all day! Based on hard data and rigorous, conservative analysis. Let’s hope it holds up.


6 posted on 11/06/2012 9:36:28 AM PST by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

This author should be a rocket scientist.


7 posted on 11/06/2012 9:39:48 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Ravi. Still optimistic for Ohio today?


8 posted on 11/06/2012 9:41:30 AM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Idk about all of this. From everything I’ve read, Nate Silver is typically pretty spot on. So I’ll take his viewpoint over the supposed weighting disparity in early polls. I guess we’ll see tonight who was right!


9 posted on 11/06/2012 9:41:50 AM PST by MyHub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Why don’t you go hide under covers today? You are so miserable in every thread.


10 posted on 11/06/2012 9:42:25 AM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All



Happy with FR now?

How about Contributing Today?

11 posted on 11/06/2012 9:43:03 AM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

Oh, yes based on all the data I’ve seen. It all comes down to turnout.


12 posted on 11/06/2012 9:43:34 AM PST by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MyHub

Nate Silver is going to get his ass handed to him today.


13 posted on 11/06/2012 9:44:13 AM PST by HerrBlucher (Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MyHub

Where’s the sarcasm tag?


14 posted on 11/06/2012 9:44:33 AM PST by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
Late Monday night the Ohio Secretary of State released the “final” early voting results from Ohio’s counties.

"Results" is not quite accurate. We know how many absentee ballots were requested & how many were cast. But we do not know how they actually voted.

15 posted on 11/06/2012 9:46:07 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
This inverse in voting segments is why the proportion of early votes in the total votes — and that virtually every poll overestimated this proportion — is so tantamount.

LOL... wut? Paramount, maybe? Even that word is awkward in that place. And that's not the only place where his writing is clumsy.

I think the author is on to something and the numbers and conclusions are pleasant to my ear. However, he's trying, but failing, to put on that authoritative scholarly tone. Maybe it's just me, but I'm always a little suspicious of the motives of folks who do that.

16 posted on 11/06/2012 9:46:51 AM PST by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Is that someone’s blog?


17 posted on 11/06/2012 9:50:51 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyHub
Nate Silver is typically pretty spot on.

He's willfully ignorant.

18 posted on 11/06/2012 9:51:01 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

I stopped reading after the second scenario. All I heard in my head was Charlie Brown’s teacher ‘Wha Wha Wha Wha’.


19 posted on 11/06/2012 9:52:10 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MyHub
Nate Silver figured ONE election when he was 29. That was 2008. Everyone picked O’Bumbler by a mile. He actually under performed against the polls.

Nate Silver MISSED 2010. Totally. He missed WI THREE TIMES! He is a Leftist Punk who couldn't figure out how to count to eleven if he wasn't a man.

20 posted on 11/06/2012 9:56:04 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson