Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prediction: Romney 325, Obama 213
The Hill ^ | 11/05/12 08:21 PM ET | Dick Morris

Posted on 11/05/2012 7:10:38 PM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Farmer Dean
Tomorrow we get to take out the trash.

and see some Obumster

D

I

V

I

N

!!!!!!!!!

61 posted on 11/05/2012 9:54:01 PM PST by wubjo (nO Terrorists; nO Tyranny; nObama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

“/s” means “sarcasm”.


62 posted on 11/05/2012 9:58:35 PM PST by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
I have a feeling that something is going to give, and give big time.

Amen, and Amen!

63 posted on 11/05/2012 10:26:03 PM PST by Kitty Mittens (To God Be All Excellent Praise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Donnafrflorida
His total was 69k. how many will he lose on those voting on election day.

10 Million less in early voting, and 10 Million less on voting day for the Kenyan usurper, as compared to his 2008 numbers, leaving the commie bastard with 49 Million total.

Out of 130 Million total votes, Obama gets 49 Million, and Romney/Ryan get 81 Million, or 37% to 62%.

That would be an even wider margin than I've been predicting with 39% to 59%. Whichever it is, I don't believe this race will be tight at all.

64 posted on 11/05/2012 10:32:00 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
IF she is hot, and she is hot, invite her to join us on FR.

Cheers!

65 posted on 11/05/2012 11:17:30 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Bookmarking in case of epic fail part II.


66 posted on 11/05/2012 11:19:31 PM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Nope, her Boyfriend is one big old bad ass dude. I wouldn't invite her anywhere. LOL

She hates Obama, but she is Socially Liberal Musician. FR wouldn't work for her. When she asks me anything, I give her the same response I would Post here, so she is a FReeper by default. She just doesn't know it.

Like I said, I was shocked at her hatred for Obama. If that is a typical response from a disappointed 2008 Obama Voter, the Prez is in deep doo doo. We shall see...

67 posted on 11/05/2012 11:36:15 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Win or lose, Impeach Obama Ben Ghazi...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

This ends at 7PM today ~ no more mr nice guy fur shur


68 posted on 11/06/2012 12:32:35 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
That's not how it works ~ as the Democrat tally drops, the Republican tally does not climb. These things operate independently of each other.

Romney has to get 59 million for Obama to tie him at 59 million.

If Obama drops another 10 million then if Romney gets the same 59 million McCain got, Obama gets 49 million ~ and that's about 108 million total ~ not 130 million.

The 2010 blowout election still involved a drop of 15 million in the Republican vote ~ against a drop of 30 million in the Democrat vote.

The next biggest drop ever was in 2006 when Republicans had a drop of 26 million votes compared to the last Presidential election.

An informed electorate knows how to really mess with the political class' minds ~ they both vote, and they withdraw their vote. This time they may be doing both.

69 posted on 11/06/2012 12:41:41 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

From your lips to God’s ears, Morris. (Although a disturbing connection.)


70 posted on 11/06/2012 12:46:12 AM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So who will the Dems blame for this loss and throw under the bus after Debbie Whatshername Schultz?


71 posted on 11/06/2012 12:53:46 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
... then if Romney gets the same 59 million McCain got, Obama gets 49 million ~ and that's about 108 million total ~ not 130 million.

So you believe Romney/Ryan will NOT get ten million votes more than McCain/Palin?

Sarah Palin alone brought in the lion's share of those 59 million votes, dragging McCain along like a ball and chain.

In this election, both Romney and Ryan are getting extremely positive receptions. Voters are extremely energized against Obama, and they are also energized for Romney/Ryan.

I see no reason why Romney/Ryan would get less than 69 million votes.

72 posted on 11/06/2012 1:15:46 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: saleman

You do the best that you can, with what you have, where you are.

All persons need to be held accountable.


73 posted on 11/06/2012 4:01:50 AM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
There are 90 million Americans who regularly fail to vote, but otherwise they are adults, and most of them are even registered to vote ~ they just skip elections for all sorts of reasons.

I see no special reason at all for Romney to get more votes than McCain though. And McCain got fewer votes than G H W Bush!

We were on a downward trend, and there's that awful 2006 election where we had 26 million Republican voters just stay home ~ didn't even bother voting for Congress ~ that's an awful lot of people to pull that trick. Same with the Democrats. They had 30 million Democrat voters stay home just two years ago.

Remember, people tend to vote for their own party's candidates, or they simply don't vote for anyone for that slot.

Remember, also, there are NO real independents who actually vote ~ they end up voting for a Republican or a Democrat 98% of the time.

We have also gone through a recent campaign that focused on just a few states ~ supposedly swing states, or states where the two major candidates were head to head. Who's been out there in THE OTHER STATES stirring up interest? I hope you don't think a handful of Broadcast TV ads will do the job ~

The point is this can end up with a very narrow win by one or the other simply because people didn't bother voting. Under certain conditions one side or the other can appear to have had a terrible loss even when the winning side ALSO failed to get out the vote!

Don't believe the polls either. The telephone call technique has failed ~ used to be you'd call people and get maybe 50% response. Recently that's down at 9%! That is such a small number certain motivated radical groups who are willing to do nothing but answer the phone can and do provide distortions.

The Chick Fil A event is a portent though ~ pro family, pro-life, pro-NO-Bama!

Every time the election has been held on November 6 Republicans have won.

When the Redskins lose at the last homegame before the election, the challenging party usually wins.

Those are also portents.

I'm sorry Joe Morris and I couldn't get together with a flock of pigeons at an enclosed courtyard so we could see what happened ~ but, alas, people would imagine that to be superstitious.

74 posted on 11/06/2012 4:08:38 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There are 90 million Americans who regularly fail to vote, but otherwise they are adults, and most of them are even registered to vote ~ they just skip elections for all sorts of reasons.

That was mentioned during the 'third party' debate on C-SPAN last night. That was fun to watch...Virgil Goode was the only sane one on the stage.

75 posted on 11/06/2012 4:15:05 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Freepers: taking out the trash since 1998.......


76 posted on 11/06/2012 4:24:50 AM PST by astounded (Barack Obama is a clear and present danger to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Freepers: taking out the trash since 1998.......


77 posted on 11/06/2012 4:25:02 AM PST by astounded (Barack Obama is a clear and present danger to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indpndtguy

“0’s ppl are getting desperate during interviews
on tv, they chose specific words that sounded
desperate..
.. Stephanie Cutter, Gibbs etc etc... they knew! lol”

Especially Gibbs! His body language screamed defeat. Barely recognized the old Baghdad Bob we’ve come to know.


78 posted on 11/06/2012 4:45:44 AM PST by pghoilman (Earth First. We'll drill the rest of the galaxy later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Or worse: IGNORE THEM!!


79 posted on 11/06/2012 4:49:17 AM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I've been playing around with the EC Vote map for a 'couple-few' weeks. I've come up with Romney at first with 280+, then to 301, and as things have rolled along to now at 333 -- due to the recent huge turnouts and surge in polls for Mitt in places like: OH, PA, WI, MI and to my shock, MINN.

What's ticked me off is that RCP hasn't changed their EC Map in a month. They still show NC as a toss-up, Montana 'leaning Romney', FL a toss-up -- Obama's given up there. And ignoring NH where Romney is ahead yet they say toss-up, and Maine where EC Votes get split. And it's like all the anecdotal stories of a Romney surge in Iowa and the dislike of Obama there didn't exist. [EC votes get split there too.]

And now, reports here in IL aren't good for Barry. Chicago early voting is way down. Ditto for suburban Cook County. And those areas are what makes IL Blue. Take away Cook County and Chicago and Bush would have won IL twice and McCain Palin would have been close. IL is in fact a VERY Red state (a sea of Red on maps in 2000 and 2004). So there is an *outside chance* that Obama *could* lose IL. Depends on actual Voting turnout today which favors the GOP. (I wouldn't bet the Rent on it though)

80 posted on 11/06/2012 5:14:37 AM PST by Condor51 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson