Pittsburgh Tribune poll shows presidential race in Pennsylvania remains too close to call (47/47)

Pittsburgh Tribune ^ | November 3, 2012 | Mike Wereschagin

[HopewellGOP]

The ads in Pittsburgh have been hard hitting and nonstop. I saw one Obama ad with Colin Powell and that one was weak.

[Atlantan]

Then Dems in PA are nervous.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/democrats-in-deep-blue-pa-voice-confidence—and-some-nervousness/2012/11/03/a551ae2c-25cf-11e2-9313-3c7f59038d93_story.html

[Toespi]

Columbus Dispatch has endorsed Romney. In reading, the key in Ohio is going to be Republican turnout, I think it is going to be huge.

[AuH2ORepublican]

I think that R/R will carry both OH and PA.

[Raycpa]

and former President Bill Clinton planned to stump for Obama

Then its virtually in the bag for Romney.

[House Atreides]

Voter fraud won’t come into play unless it is down to a few thousand votes. It is a problem, but the effect isn’t bad enough to negate a 1%+ win.
*****************************************************************
You don’t know the situation in Philadelphia. Fraudulent voting is in the tens of thousands of votes; not “a few thousand”. It’s unfortunate that Voter ID won’t be in effect this year in PA. I hope that at least the poll watchers will ask to see ID (they’re allowed to do that this year even though the potential voter is not required to produce it). Just asking for ID may have some deterrent effect.