"Okay, Okay, Okay. Hello fellow democrats.
Here's my new campaign slogan and I think you will really like it:"
"What happense in Benghazi stays in Benghazi."
CNN
Blood in the water
Everything makes sense through the lens of:
Obama-theUndocumented’s FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS
IS:
SAVE ISLAM.
HELP ISLAM.
PROTECT ISLAM.
WEAPONIZE ISLAM.
DEFEND ISLAM.
(and from ObamaCARE to Benghazi, it shows).
From CNN, no less..
Uh oh.....you know you are in deep doodoo when CNN does their job.
Bennett will mysteriously disappear from CNN and he will receive a letter from the IRS for his actions.
****CIA operators caught in the attack in Benghazi requested military backup but were denied by higher headquarters.***
Should read: HINDQUARTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is what happened:
Justice with Judge Jeanine Opening Statement 10/27/12 regarding Benghazi coverup.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg-e71IDAUw&;
He secured the dead bodies,,,gotta understand the nuance. sarc/
Well, for my next door neighbors, I am sure this is a shock to hear about this today for the FIRST time. They watch nothing but CNN, imagine their shock this morning. And to have the CNN piece to be quoting Fox is amazing. (Got a kick out of the “if it’s true”). I wonder if they will keep their life size Obama cardboard statue in their living room? As someone said above...this is blood in the water.
This is NOT credible.
I an guessing that “O” passed the information along to his terrorist buddies, that the embassy was vulnerable.
I believe that he could NOT possibly have done such an abysmal job of handling the attack, UNLESS he was to some degree complicit IN the attack. THAT'S how much I distrust the ‘President’. THAT'S how little esteem and credibility he has with me!
There is only one person in the USA, that has the authority to send anyone to rescue these 4 people in Benghazi, and that person is the POTUS. And this POTUS had that opportunity to do the “RIGHT THING” and he declined that opportunity. What he did was to immediately found somebody to blame. And who did he put the “BLAME” on? Why, he blamed a non-descript US citizen, that had something on “FACE BOOK” movie that 99% of the world’s population hadn’t seen. And that man is still in jail on a trumped up charge. Meanwhile, everybody in this administration is ducking the real story of what really happened in Benghazi. What the real story of this sad event, is that OBAMA lost his “BALLS” Rather than doing the “RIGHT THING” and anger his MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD friends. Let’s face the facts. We have a coward as the POTUS of this country.
Nothing is covered up that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known. Whatever you have said in the dark shall be heard in the light, and what you have whispered in private rooms shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.
Amen and Amen ...
They served their country — now it's time for them to save the country from Obama’s dishonorable dodging of the truth.
bttt
"Okay, Okay, Okay. Hello fellow democrats.
Here's my new campaign slogan and I think you will really like it:"
"What happense in Benghazi stays in Benghazi."
Mitt could say:
“This administration has has more than enough time to determine what THEY were doing and when.”
“Investigating what happened and why, in Benghazi, is NOT a precursor to the administration explaining to the American people, what happened in Washington, while American’s were calling for help in Benghazi!”
About That ‘Facility’
As was noted on AT recently, a retired State Department Foreign Service Officer said: “Our Benghazi facility was a half-baked operation. It was not a consulate. It was a ‘facility’ with an ambiguous purpose, at least as far as the unclassified world is concerned.”
If it was not a consulate, then it was not sovereign United States territory. This fact has important legal consequences — as was only just touched upon (at ~13:00, but pick up at ~10:00 for full context) by Newt Gingrich on Fox News in his appearance on Greta Van Susteren’s Oct. 30 show (caution: auto-play).
One of these consequences may be that the United States had no “legal” authority under international law unilaterally to violate sovereign Libyan airspace by sending in a military force or by engaging attackers with U.S. aircraft, irrespective of the fact that U.S. citizens, including an ambassador, were the ones being attacked.
The purpose of this “facility” and its associated “safe-house” is increasingly becoming less ambiguous, as J.D. Longstreet points out:
That CIA “safe-house” has troubled me from the very beginning. ... What was the CIA doing there? There was no embassy in Benghazi. In fact, the building attacked was not even a consulate. If anything, it was a “mission” ... this was NOT an embassy.
It no longer reasonably can be denied that what was going on in Benghazi was “Fast and Furious in the Maghreb” being run by Ambassador Stevens, et al. at the direction of “fill in the blank.”
He continues:
A few weeks ago, there was a report that Libyan militia members had been ordered to turn-in the weapons that had been supplied them in their struggle to overthrow Qaddafi. That report confirmed that many of those weapons had been turned in. Where did those weapons go? Perhaps, to the Syrian rebels? It has been suspected for some time now that the US has been supplying small arms to the rebels in Syria for a while-even though the Obama Administration denies it.
Read the rest of that whole piece and see if you concur that “there was a covert operation underway-one so black that sacrificing the lives of four Americans was deemed ‘worth it’ by our leaders in Washington.”
The central issue at the heart of the Benghazi fiasco and cover-up would appear to be that Team Obama cannot admit that it could not use the military to combat this attack on this “black” operation, the existence of which it cannot admit.
As put by Bob Owens:
We’ve also heard claims about why Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi to begin with: some sources suggest this was part of an Obama administration plot to arm Syrian rebels. ... If Ambassador Stevens was facilitating weapons transfers from Libya to Syrian Islamist forces aligned with al-Qaeda, via his Turkish alliance, then we are at a troubling, perhaps catastrophic point in this republic’s history. We have been at war with the Islamist hydra of al-Qaeda for more than a decade, and now sources are accusing a sitting president of arming this enemy.
In the words of Sir Walter Scott, “Oh! what a tangled web we weave When first we practice to deceive!”
Thus far, the consulate vs. “facility” issue, not surprisingly, seems not to have been noted elsewhere.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/11/about_that_facility.html#ixzz2AzAd5stP
CNN Finally covering Benghazi? Do my eyes Believe? Unfortunately only an opinion article. Maybe it will leak over to CNN on cable!!!
