To: Katechon
From Panetta's explanation it seems that he and the generals weren't sure what antiaircraft weapons the attacking terrorists had. There was lots of advanced weaponery supplied to the anti-Gaddafi forces by the US and others during the uprising and it is conceivable that the attackers may have set up a trap against the routine response scenarios (e.g. as Aidid's forces had done in Mogadishu).
Hence, Panetta and the generals (or Obama) may have decided to take the safest course, callous and cowardly as it is. The most likely unfolding, if the Obama team gets pushed to the wall on this matter before Tuesday,is that Panetta will take the fall.
To: nightlight7
From Panetta's explanation it seems that he and the generals weren't sure what antiaircraft weapons the attacking terrorists had. There was lots of advanced weaponery supplied to the anti-Gaddafi forces by the US and others during the uprising and it is conceivable that the attackers may have set up a trap against the routine response scenarios (e.g. as Aidid's forces had done in Mogadishu). Hence, Panetta and the generals (or Obama) may have decided to take the safest course, callous and cowardly as it is. The most likely unfolding, if the Obama team gets pushed to the wall on this matter before Tuesday,is that Panetta will take the fall. Who has the inventory list of what was kept in Benghazi? I think the last thing this administration wanted US to know is what they were doing in Benghazi and military action to save Americans, might have created quite a big flash in the night sky.
21 posted on
11/01/2012 12:55:27 AM PDT by
Just mythoughts
(Please help Todd Akin defeat Claire and the GOP-e send money!!!!!)
To: nightlight7
I am starting to think that Obama made the call and that he has a deal with Panetta to pardon him. If Panetta will say it was his fault and provides cover thru the election to inoculate Obama for the election and then pardons him after the election.
Then Obama gets away without the heat and nobody will ever really know the truth and they get away with this treason against our brave American worriors.
23 posted on
11/01/2012 2:12:43 AM PDT by
R0CK3T
To: nightlight7
Check Google Maps / my post above. It looks to me like we could have brought in a team (or more) from the South. This is especially true if we’d started moving assets right away.
29 posted on
11/01/2012 2:54:11 AM PDT by
Paul R.
(We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
To: nightlight7
Except for the fact that there were not one, but TWO unarmed drones in the area and neither one was shot at. So the idea that they were afraid of putting an ARMED drone in the air is ludicrous.
31 posted on
11/01/2012 3:06:20 AM PDT by
MestaMachine
(obama kills and none dare call it treason)
To: nightlight7
FA 18s could have safely targeted the Embassy attack with JDAMs from high altitude where the SAMS can’t reach
36 posted on
11/01/2012 4:46:18 AM PDT by
rdcbn
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson