Why should anyone be fair to coprophiles?
Lots of dancing around here, but hard to get around the base fact: Marriage is the union of a man and woman in matrimony. Re-writing the dictionary, trying to change language, does nothing to change this fact. It is and will continue to be an affirmation by the government of a religious ceremony. If the government believes it no longer has an interest in regulating this ceremony and issuance from it, it can get out of the business.
Shame Romney didn’t take this line, and instead starting handing out marriage licenses to those who aren’t qualified.
I think it’s perfectly fair to sinners to tell them we won’t help them sin, especially against the will of others.
That’s easy - because there’s nothing good about “same-sex marriage”.
That's utterly absurd, Dennis. There never are good people on the side of evil. Period. There are clear, unambiguous moral absolutes and any tolerance of this abomination (as defined by God Almighty) is indefensible.
he’s making this way too hard
Jeepers.
Because He made them male and He made then female for His own purpose.
Trying to figure the logic of the headline.
There is no such thing as same sex marriage, there is civil unions which should be any two people (or more) agreeing on some sort of ‘union’.
Marriage is and will always be something God ordained between ONE man and ONE woman.
Marriage is a representation of Christ and His church.
Poor guy, doesn’t even know what marriage is.
Next he’ll be debating with himself whether people should be allowed to keep unicorns as pets.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
Opponents of same-sex marriage also ask:
If homosexual, why not cousins? Why not brothers and sisters? Why not multiple partners?
Why allow homos but not cousins to marry?
Until you fight for cousins’ rights to marriage - which are specifically banned - you aren’t truly about “being fair” or “open”. You’re in it only for yourselves/homos.
The United States of Fairness. How can that go wrong?
Is it fair that opposite sex couples in most situations can marry one another, but same sex couples ‘in love’ are not allowed?
Well..
Is it fair that most opposite sex couples under 40 can reproduce naturally, but same sex couples ‘in love’ can not?
Is nature fair? Should we pass a law to make it fairer?
This is what you get when morons vote.
mark
I think everyone here is being too hard on Dennis. I think he makes a compelling argument that is best suited for our friends and family that may disagree with our conservative stance on marriage.
This is pretty much how I’ve argued it in the past and I’ve had great success. People who are not practicing or religious tend to shut down when presented with any moral argument based on religion.