Replies

What’s going to be said when the first commercial airliner is downed by one the “lost” Man-Pads?”

Sorry, that cat is rrrrrrrr outta the bag on that one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-portable_air-defense_systems

MANPADS are all over already for decades, you can probably buy them on the street in Istanbul. Everyone knows for a long time now that U.S. and their NGOs are supporting the Syrian rebels and the Russians and their NGOs are supporting Assad.

Kaddafi's stockpiles were raided, of course, that happened many moons ago. Everyone knows weapons were going to Syria via Turkey, which still functions as a crossroads after thousands of years.

IMHO, the meeting with the Turkish foreign minister was simply the bait in the kidnap trap for poor Ambassador Stevens. If NGOs set this up, neither Stevens nor the Turk would know about the trap, so there would be no possibility of the Turk tipping him off.

Everyone knows for a long time now that U.S. and their NGOs are supporting the Syrian rebels and the Russians and their NGOs are supporting Assad.

My comment above is not clear enough.

When I say "U.S. and their NGOs"... IMHO, this operation is part of the overall 20 years of revolutions that were cooked up by NGOs, specifically the Soros and leftist networks. The GWB administration, IMHO, pursued this because the likes of CFR and the "spread democracy" elitists permeate the Republican party. It is simply conventional wisdom amongst U.S. elites.

The difference is that the New Left Democratic Shadow Party is participating knowing that it is a ruse to get U.S. policy shifted towards working with leftist and Soros NGO networks and their true goal is New World Order which entails an end to U.S. hegemony, while the Republican elites do not see through the "spreading democracy" ruse. They actually think they are doing the opposite - extending U.S. hegemony.

Nowhere is this more clear in the mideast, in the multi-layer elaborate scheming of the NGOs. The Conservative grassroots in the U.S. is fuming, as their news media concurs, that the scandal about the Arab spring is that jihadists are coming to power. This concern is even echoed inside government. However, careful research indicates that NGO players continue to chip away at marginalizing the islamic revolutionaries in the new governments - all the while allowing the militants to continue to be part of the mix, of course preserving them for future needs of the NGO networks. How else does one explain a new Libyan government that slowly but surely is taking shape as one run by people educated in the U.S. and Eastern Europe ? The only answer is that not only do islamic militant figures pervade the new government, but NGO figures do as well. We simply don't hear about that from U.S. news services at all.

The strategic pattern of NGO leftists and Soros has always been to get inside of a government, subvert it by making the NGOs plans the government's, then actually use the government to do a large part of their work. It also spans countries: one subverted government's intelligence service can be used to subvert another nation's government.

Take USAID - it thinks it's using NGOs, but in reality, the NGOs are using it.

Gets complicated, but it's really simple if one keeps one's eye on the ball.