Political Junkie's Guide To The Elections - Week Ending October 27, 2012 (Senate Slowly Swinging)

Rasmussen Reports Polling Data ^ | October 27, 2012 | Political Junkie Too

[Marcella]

“BTW, it is statistically very highly unlikely that a three-point leader in the national popular vote (which Romney has now pretty much maintained for a week in Rasmussen and even Gallup) can lose the electoral college.”

With respect to you, I don't think that is true. It doesn't matter how many millions you have for Romney in already known red states and doesn't matter how many millions Hussein has in already known blue states - it DOES matter if you have a majority for Romney in a swing state, even it is one vote that makes that a majority in order to get those electoral votes.

I really only care about states that are not decided at this time so close to the election.

[1010RD]

It’s happening already:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2951834/posts

The narrative needs to immediately be the “Do-Nothing Reid Senate”. No matter if the GOP takes the Senate or not you need to accurately portray the enemy, identify his obstruction and convince the American people that we need the Senate to get the economy going.

Bury progressivisim under its own weight.

[Political Junkie Too]

I agree about the messaging. However, "do-nothing" has been very over-used.

I'd call it the "Run from Responsibility Reid Senate."

Ask Harry Reid what he's so afraid of that he's unwilling to offer the American People a proper Senate budget?

Make it about fear and incompetence, not about obstruction.

Convince the People that Democrats are afraid to tell the people what they really think.

-PJ