Skip to comments.CBS: At what point does this become a story beyond Fox News? [EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators denied help]
Posted on 10/27/2012 3:29:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
click here to read article
It becomes a story ‘beyond’ when the all-glorious MSM finally reconciles to themselves the fact that Obama is going to lose and they must somehow begin to rehabilitate their credibility.
For criminals, acts of contrition only begin after they are caught.
The MSM will NEVER cover this story because their IDOL, Obama and Hillary have BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS!
Someone at CBA Money is going Rogue.
CBS = Communist Broadcast System
It becomes a story beyond when all the alphabets realize all their viewers are watching Fox!
If I’m not mistaken, it was Sheryl Adelson (?) from CBS who first broke the story, then Fox picked up on it. If my information is wrong, please correct me.
I don’t see how this story stays out of the mouthpiece media forever. I don’t think Pravda in the 1970s was this bad.
The accusation by the Left was that the only reason this is a story is because of right-wing politics.
In reality, the only reason it ISN’T a story, is because of Left-wing politics.
If this is not being coveed on NBC, CBS, CNN, ABC, PBS etc., then it didn’t really happen. /sarc>
If we had such a "data base" it would be easy to send the link to journalists in the MSM and bloggers.
Remember, apart from political bias, the one thig that stops a journo from writing about a story like this is the many fact he/she will have to gather - not least to be able to withstand the blow-back from the WH.
Hillary? Just turn that over in your mind.
Shamefully it won’t be covered. And that should scare the living daylights out of all of us....because it means there is no freedom of speech or freedom of the press.
OK, we will gather the FACTS and put them in their inboxes.
I think it’s a good idea, but, honestly, most of the MSM are even too lazy to go grab and cite even such a centrally located cache of truth as that.
They prefer to mingle and chat amongst themselves, propagating the same lies and chat, spouting the WH talking points precisely because it offers no peer blowback. The very last thing they want is to invite the wrath of David Axelrod or that Jarrett ‘woman’.
Sorry, that’s the way it works (and not only in the US). I have been involved in a number of election campaigns here in Sweden, and believe me there is nothing the journalists love as much as a ready made story - they can actually improve it, package it, and sell it very well, but they need someone to feed them (and explain) the facts....
What if they pulled a Torricelli and put another name at the top of the ticket? We already know they think they can do anything.
Especially for the way the father Woods, and the Mother Smith have been slighted by the Obama adm.
The MSM is NOT going to be able to cover up for Obama on Benghazi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.