Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBD Tracking Poll, 10/23: O47-R45 (Romney gains 2)
Investors.com ^ | 10/23/12

Posted on 10/23/2012 11:13:53 AM PDT by CA Conservative

Obama: +2.0 Obama 46.5% | Romney 44.5% Obama’s lead over Romney eroded further in a polling taken the day of the final debate. Romney strengthened among males, going from a 1-point deficit two days ago to a 4-point lead. Likewise, Romney has gained 6 points among those described as “working class.” Romney also appears to have regained momentum among Catholic voters, among whom he was trailing three days ago, but has opened up an 8-point lead.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections2012; polls
IBD is moving the same direction as Rasmussen, and it looks like IBD, Ras and Gallup should all converge at about R+4 in a few days.
1 posted on 10/23/2012 11:13:53 AM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

for later


2 posted on 10/23/2012 11:18:19 AM PDT by Doctor 2Brains (If the government were Paris Hilton, it could not score a free drink in a bar full of lonely sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

Some conservative aren’t counted as “Likely Voters” because they sat out the 2008 elections.

When you combine that with the poll bias due to High Dem enthusiasm last time, that isn’t present this time, the polls are 2-3 points short on measuring Romney support.


3 posted on 10/23/2012 11:22:30 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

It’s all about momentum and Romney still has it.


4 posted on 10/23/2012 11:26:19 AM PDT by tatown (Obama was right, it was a 'one term proposition')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

They all seem to have Zero at 46-47%. That’s a killer number at this point.


5 posted on 10/23/2012 11:26:34 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

Some conservative aren’t counted as “Likely Voters” because they sat out the 2008 elections.

When you combine that with the poll bias due to High Dem enthusiasm last time, that isn’t present this time, the polls are 2-3 points short on measuring Romney support.


6 posted on 10/23/2012 11:28:06 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

“Some conservative aren’t counted as “Likely Voters” because they sat out the 2008 elections.

When you combine that with the poll bias due to High Dem enthusiasm last time, that isn’t present this time, the polls are 2-3 points short on measuring Romney support.”

This is an interesting observation. I don’t think Gallup and Rasmussen aren’t short because of what you’re pointing out here, (since it’s hard to be believe, for example, that Romney is really ahead by 8 instead of 6), but it could explain, at least in part, why the IBD poll has been so different than the Gallup poll. They were 10 points apart!


7 posted on 10/23/2012 11:30:35 AM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Sorry, I got a Network error after the first post, so I hit it again.....


8 posted on 10/23/2012 11:31:32 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
IBD is moving the same direction as Rasmussen, and it looks like IBD, Ras and Gallup should all converge at about R+4 in a few days.

There needs to be a whole lot of converging going on.

Gallup (presumed liberal) and IBD (presumed conservative) differ by 7 points, opposite of presumption.

9 posted on 10/23/2012 11:33:00 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

A +7 spread for Democrats!


10 posted on 10/23/2012 11:36:06 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Keep in mind that IBD uses a D+7 turnout model - essentially predicting the same Dem advantage as 2008... Not gonna happen.


11 posted on 10/23/2012 11:36:09 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

looks like the polls are moving more toward Gallup than the other way around - woo hoo!


12 posted on 10/23/2012 11:40:02 AM PDT by trebb (Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
Obama’s core support comes from the jewish, atheists, blacks, and young women.

Young women want abortions
Atheists want seclarism
Blacks want power
And what does the Jewish vote want?

13 posted on 10/23/2012 11:47:05 AM PDT by oldbrowser (An empty chair attracts a stadium full of empty chairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

All polls will start moving toward the truth now. They need to be seen as accurate in that last week otherwise they Zogby themselves and become a laughingstock, a useless poll.


14 posted on 10/23/2012 12:05:55 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

“Some conservative aren’t counted as “Likely Voters” because they sat out the 2008 elections.”

Conservative Republicans because of McCain and RINO’s because of Palin.


15 posted on 10/23/2012 12:13:03 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson